Skip to main content

Security report for dasecrets.lv

D&A Secrets · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

D&A Secrets is a Latvian-based online retailer specializing in adult products including lingerie, sexual health items, and fetish accessories. The website targets an adult audience with explicit age verification and content warnings. The business operates as a small e-commerce entity with clear company registration and VAT information presented, supporting its legitimacy. The market position is niche, focusing on intimate and adult pleasure products. Technically, the website uses standard web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Swiper, with assets hosted on Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, indicating a modern but basic infrastructure. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and performance but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is moderate; while HTTPS is implied, no security headers or cookie consent mechanisms were detected, and no incident response or security policy information is provided. WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dasecrets.lv

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail sector with a focus on adult products, serving a mature audience. Its business model is direct-to-consumer e-commerce, leveraging online sales channels. The presence of VAT and registration numbers indicates formal business operations in Latvia. The website's multilingual support (English, Russian, Latvian) suggests targeting regional markets. The absence of visible analytics or marketing tools limits insights into customer engagement strategies. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries were identified. The company maintains a clear brand identity with consistent messaging around adult content and privacy. Growth potential exists in expanding marketing and compliance capabilities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security awareness through the implementation of an age verification modal to restrict underage access. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. No cookie consent banner or GDPR compliance mechanisms were found, which may expose the company to regulatory risks. The lack of incident response contact information or security policies indicates limited preparedness for security incidents. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided HTML. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires significant improvements to meet best practices and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and privacy management tools to ensure GDPR compliance and improve user trust.
  3. Publish clear security and incident response policies with dedicated contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party libraries and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility and SEO features to improve user experience and search engine visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA D&A Secrets
VAT number
LV40203112221
Registration number
40203112221
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
D&A Secrets
Description
D&A Secrets is an online shop, which opens to you the world of hidden pleasure. We help you explore yourself and create your most intimate secrets.
Key services
Online retail of adult clothing, Sexual health products, Fetish products
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Swiper
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Age verification modal for adult content

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult-oriented e-commerce platform specializing in lingerie, sexual health, and fetish products.
  2. Content is well structured with clear navigation and language options.
  3. Age verification modal is implemented to restrict underage access.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust verification.
  5. No visible security headers or cookie consent mechanisms detected.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML.
  7. Contact information including company name, VAT, registration number, email, and physical address is clearly presented in footer.
  8. No social media links explicitly found except a mention to follow on 'X' (Twitter) without direct link.
  9. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  10. External resources loaded from trusted CDNs and Microsoft Azure Blob Storage.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard front-end technology stack with jQuery, Bootstrap, and Swiper for UI components and responsiveness. Images and static assets are hosted on Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, indicating cloud hosting usage. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and performance but lacks advanced SEO meta tags and accessibility features. No CMS or backend technology was identified from the HTML content. The absence of analytics and tracking scripts suggests minimal user data collection, which may limit marketing insights but benefits privacy. The technical implementation is solid for a small e-commerce site but could be modernized with enhanced security and compliance tooling.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dasecrets.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dasecrets.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.