Skip to main content

Security report for darzstev.lv

DD Projekti · Real Estate · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dārzs Tev is a Latvian-based small business specializing in garden design and landscaping services. Their offerings include detailed garden projects, planting, maintenance, paving, and visualization services aimed at residential customers. The website presents a professional portfolio and clear contact information, positioning the company as a local expert in garden aesthetics and landscaping. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using popular plugins and themes, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but lacks advanced security headers and visible privacy or cookie policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching darzstev.lv

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the Real Estate sector focusing on garden design and landscaping. Their business model is service-oriented, targeting homeowners and garden enthusiasts in Latvia. They maintain partnerships with several local companies, enhancing their service ecosystem. The website content and portfolio indicate a focus on quality and customer satisfaction. The use of WordPress and common plugins suggests a standard digital infrastructure suitable for small businesses. Growth potential exists through improved digital marketing and compliance enhancements. The company appears credible with consistent branding and clear service descriptions, though limited information on company size or founding year is available.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism is a compliance gap, especially under GDPR regulations applicable in Latvia. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency in case of security issues. The site uses Google Analytics, indicating some level of user tracking but without visible privacy controls. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in headers, privacy compliance, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with visible user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  4. Publish a security.txt file or similar vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and incident response.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO metadata to improve user experience and search engine ranking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DD Projekti
Description
Dārzs Tev offers garden design projects and related landscaping services including garden planning, planting, maintenance, paving, and visualization services.
Key services
Dārza projektēšana (Garden design projects), Apzaļumošana (Planting and greening), Labiekārtošana (Landscaping), Kopšana (Garden maintenance), Bruģēšana (Paving), Dobju rekonstrukcija (Flowerbed reconstruction), Zāliena ierīkošana (Lawn installation), Vizualizācijas (Visualizations)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, WordPress, Kadence Slider, Contact Form 7, SiteOrigin Panels
Frameworks
WordPress theme Virtue Premium
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JS libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based garden design and landscaping service site in Latvian language.
  2. Content is well structured with clear service descriptions and portfolio.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided in the footer with phone and email.
  4. No privacy or cookie policies found on the homepage HTML content.
  5. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  6. Uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  9. Site uses HTTPS with no visible security header information in HTML.
  10. Social media presence limited to Facebook link.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Virtue Premium theme and plugins like Contact Form 7, Kadence Slider, and SiteOrigin Panels. It uses jQuery and Google Analytics for functionality and tracking. The site loads asynchronously with lazy loading for images, improving performance. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. However, no advanced hosting or CDN information is available. The site lacks some modern security headers and privacy compliance features. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and accessibility. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small business website but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with darzstev.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review darzstev.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.