Skip to main content

Security report for darwishlogistics.io

Darwish Logistics · Transportation · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Darwish Logistics operates a website primarily serving as a login portal for its users, likely clients or employees. The business appears to be in the transportation and logistics sector, targeting users who require access to internal systems. The website content is minimal, with no detailed public-facing business information or marketing content. The meta description is generic and does not provide insight into the company's services or market position. The domain WHOIS data is privacy protected and shows an anomalous future creation date, which raises concerns about data accuracy and transparency. The hosting provider is HOSTINGER operations, UAB, a known hosting company.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching darwishlogistics.io

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
35
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company seems to be a small-sized logistics service provider with a focus on client or employee portal access rather than public marketing. There is no visible information about partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies. The lack of contact information and business details limits the ability to assess market positioning or competitive advantages. The website's minimal content and absence of trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials suggest an early-stage or low-profile business presence online.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS (assumed from hosting provider and common practice, though SSL configuration details are not provided). However, no security headers were detected, and the login form lacks anti-automation protections such as CAPTCHA or CSRF tokens. The absence of DNSSEC and privacy-protected WHOIS data reduces transparency. There is no evidence of incident response or security policies published. Overall, the security posture is basic and could be improved significantly to protect user credentials and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve privacy compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to harden the website.
  3. Introduce CAPTCHA or other bot mitigation techniques on login forms to prevent automated attacks.
  4. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security.
  5. Provide clear contact information and business details to enhance credibility and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Darwish Logistics
Description
Darwish Logistics appears to be a logistics and transportation service provider. The website content is minimal but indicates a login portal for users, suggesting a client or employee access system. The meta description 'Vantage Sales Pilot' is generic and does not provide detailed business description.
Key services
Logistics, Transportation
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, FontAwesome, Iconsax, Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Form uses POST method for login

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login portal for Darwish Logistics with minimal public content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses publicly listed.
  4. No social media or external business links found except for common CDN and font providers.
  5. Technical implementation uses common libraries but lacks advanced security measures.
  6. WHOIS data is privacy protected and shows suspicious future creation date.
  7. No advertising or analytics services detected.
  8. Content is safe and professional but very limited in scope.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for scripting, FontAwesome and Iconsax for icons, and Google Fonts for typography. The hosting provider is HOSTINGER operations, UAB. The site is mobile optimized with basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is minimal with a generic meta description and no Open Graph or structured data found. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading. The site lacks advanced frameworks or CMS indications, suggesting a custom or simple static/dynamic site. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist, especially in security and SEO.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with darwishlogistics.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review darwishlogistics.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.