Skip to main content

Security report for daruiesteviata.ro

Asociația Dăruiește Viață · Non-profit · Romania

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Asociația Dăruiește Viață is a Romanian non-profit organization dedicated to fundraising for pediatric healthcare infrastructure, specifically the Marie Curie pediatric medical campus. The website serves as a platform to engage donors and supporters through campaigns such as "Promit". The organization positions itself as a trusted entity in the Romanian healthcare non-profit sector, leveraging modern web technologies and secure payment solutions to facilitate donations. Technically, the website is built on a modern stack including Next.js and React, with integration of Stripe for payment processing and Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie management. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, cookie consent mechanisms, and no visible vulnerabilities. However, the absence of explicit contact information, terms of service, and security incident response details are areas for improvement. Overall, the domain is privacy protected via ROTLD, which is common and justified for this business type, and the website content aligns with the organization's mission and legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include publishing terms of service, incident response contacts, and a security.txt file to enhance transparency and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching daruiesteviata.ro

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector focusing on healthcare fundraising in Romania. Its business model revolves around donor engagement and campaign-driven fundraising efforts. The website targets Romanian donors and healthcare supporters, providing clear messaging and calls to action. The use of Stripe as a payment partner indicates a professional approach to handling donations securely. The organization benefits from a consistent brand presence and a well-structured digital platform. Growth indicators include active campaigns and integration of analytics and marketing tools. Partnerships with Stripe and Google services support operational efficiency and marketing effectiveness. The lack of visible contact details may limit direct engagement but does not detract significantly from the overall credibility given the organization's established presence.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and modern security headers likely in place. The use of Cookiebot ensures GDPR-compliant cookie consent management, reflecting awareness of privacy regulations. Payment processing is securely handled by Stripe, reducing risk exposure. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents a compliance gap and potential risk in incident management. The organization should consider publishing these details to improve security transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is strong for a non-profit website but can be enhanced with additional policy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear and accessible terms of service page to define user and donor rights and obligations.
  2. Add explicit incident response and security contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident management.
  3. Implement and publish a security.txt file to formalize vulnerability disclosure processes.
  4. Enhance contact information availability to improve donor trust and engagement.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie policies to maintain compliance with evolving regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Asociația Dăruiește Viață
Description
Non-profit organization focused on fundraising for pediatric medical campus development, specifically the Marie Curie pediatric medical campus.
Key services
Fundraising campaigns, Donor engagement, Healthcare support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Stripe, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • Use of Stripe for secure payments

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense
Tracking pixels
Google Ads Conversion Tracking
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is privacy protected by ROTLD, limiting registrant visibility.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented via Cookiebot.
  4. Use of modern web technologies (Next.js, React) and secure payment integration (Stripe).
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on the analyzed page.
  6. No terms of service page detected in the provided content.
  7. Privacy policy is present and appears comprehensive and GDPR compliant.
  8. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure found.
  9. No explicit security or incident response contact information found.
  10. Website content is focused on non-profit fundraising for pediatric healthcare.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Next.js and React, indicating a modern and scalable front-end framework. Integration with Stripe provides secure payment capabilities. Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot are used for marketing and privacy compliance respectively. The site loads multiple JavaScript chunks asynchronously, suggesting optimization for performance. Mobile optimization and accessibility features are well implemented. No CMS was explicitly detected, implying a custom or headless approach. Hosting provider details were not found in the provided data. Performance is moderate, with potential for further optimization. The technical stack supports a professional and secure user experience suitable for the organization's fundraising goals.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with daruiesteviata.ro. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review daruiesteviata.ro.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.