Skip to main content

Security report for danstore.lv

LSEZ SIA Dan Store · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LSEZ SIA Dan Store operates as a specialized bulk cargo handling and storage service provider located in the port of Liepaja, Latvia. The company offers flexible logistics solutions leveraging direct railway connections, modern infrastructure, and qualified personnel. Their services include bulk cargo processing and quality control of grains and rapeseed seeds, supported by a GMP plus certification that underscores their commitment to quality standards. The website is professionally designed, providing clear business information and contact details, targeting businesses requiring port logistics services. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bootstrap and uses common plugins including a cookie consent manager and Facebook SDK for marketing. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well. Security-wise, HTTPS is enforced and Wordfence firewall cookies are present, but security headers are not explicitly detected in the HTML. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the security posture is solid though could be improved with additional HTTP security headers and a published vulnerability disclosure policy. The absence of WHOIS data limits full domain trust assessment, but the website content and business information appear legitimate and professional. No adult or questionable content is present, making the site safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching danstore.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Dan Store holds a niche position in the transportation sector focused on port logistics in Liepaja, Latvia. Their competitive advantage lies in their direct railway access and modern facilities, enabling efficient bulk cargo handling. The business model is service-oriented, catering to industrial and commercial clients needing storage and quality control of agricultural commodities. The presence of GMP plus certification enhances trust and market credibility. The company appears small-sized with a local market focus. The website supports their business with clear contact points and professional presentation, though no explicit information on founding year or parent company is available. The lack of WHOIS data restricts deeper insights into domain age and ownership consistency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and Wordfence firewall integration indicated by cookies. The cookie consent banner complies with GDPR requirements, enhancing privacy protection. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. There is no visible incident response or security policy page, nor a vulnerability disclosure mechanism like security.txt. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business website but could be strengthened with additional best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Maintain regular updates of WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a security policy and vulnerability disclosure page or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate potential weaknesses.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimizations to improve user experience and search engine visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
LSEZ SIA Dan Store
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LSEZ SIA Dan Store
Description
LSEZ SIA Dan Store is engaged in bulk cargo handling and storage in the port of Liepaja, providing flexible cargo logistics solutions with direct railway access, modern infrastructure, equipment, and qualified personnel.
Key services
Bulk cargo handling and storage, Grain and rapeseed seed quality control
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Bootstrap, Zion Builder, Cookie Law Info plugin, Facebook SDK
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • Wordfence firewall cookies detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is business-oriented, focused on bulk cargo handling and storage services.
  3. Cookie consent banner is implemented with detailed cookie categories and descriptions.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address.
  5. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  7. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and frameworks.
  8. No obvious security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data detected in HTML.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for client-side scripting. It employs the Zion Builder for page construction and the Cookie Law Info plugin for GDPR compliance. Facebook SDK is integrated for social media marketing and tracking. The site loads external resources from Google Fonts and Facebook domains. Performance is moderate with no major blocking scripts detected. Mobile optimization is good, and navigation is clear and user-friendly. There is room for improvement in accessibility compliance and implementation of advanced security headers. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with danstore.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review danstore.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.