Skip to main content

Security report for danonesouteze.cz

Danone a.s. · Retail · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and Network security.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Danone soutěže is a promotional website operated by Danone a.s., a large multinational food company, targeting Czech consumers with product contests and marketing campaigns. The site consolidates current and past contests, providing users with opportunities to participate and win prizes, thereby enhancing brand engagement and loyalty. The website is professionally designed with consistent Danone branding and clear navigation, optimized for both desktop and mobile users. It employs modern web technologies including WordPress with Oxygen Builder, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for privacy compliance. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, though explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly disclosed. The absence of WHOIS data due to privacy protection is typical for corporate domains and does not detract from the site's legitimacy. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence aligned with corporate standards and regulatory compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching danonesouteze.cz

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
88
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention danonesouteze.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for danonesouteze.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves as a marketing platform for Danone's consumer engagement through contests linked to product purchases. It positions Danone as an active brand in the Czech retail sector, leveraging promotional campaigns to drive sales and customer interaction. The business model focuses on direct consumer incentives and brand visibility. The site integrates with Danone's broader digital ecosystem, including the main corporate site and regional promotional sites. The presence of multiple active contests with clear prize offerings and timelines indicates a well-managed promotional strategy. The target audience includes Danone product consumers and potential customers in the Czech Republic. The site reflects Danone's large enterprise scale and global brand recognition, supported by localized marketing efforts.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security foundation with HTTPS and cookie consent compliance. Use of reputable third-party services like Google Analytics and Cookiebot is evident, with no exposed sensitive data or vulnerable scripts detected in the HTML content. However, the site lacks publicly available detailed security policies or incident response contacts, which could enhance transparency and trust. Security headers are not explicitly visible but are likely implemented given the HTTPS usage. The contact form collects personal data with appropriate consent notices, aligning with GDPR requirements. Recommendations include enhancing security header implementation, publishing security policies, and continuous monitoring of third-party components to mitigate risks.

Recommendations

  1. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency.
  2. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Regularly audit and update all third-party scripts and plugins to prevent vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.
  5. Maintain and monitor cookie consent mechanisms to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Danone a.s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Danone a.s.
Description
Soutěžte s Danone a vyhrajte lákavé ceny!
Key services
Hosting product competitions, Consumer engagement, Marketing promotions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, WordPress Oxygen Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot tracking
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Strong cookie consent implementation with detailed categories and user controls
  3. Contact form collects personal data with clear privacy notice and consent
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies publicly disclosed
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, likely due to privacy protection
  6. Use of reputable third-party services like Google Analytics and Cookiebot
  7. Consistent branding with Danone logos and references
  8. Multiple active promotional contests with clear dates and prizes
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Oxygen Builder framework, leveraging jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. Cookiebot is integrated for cookie consent management, providing granular user controls. The site loads asynchronously loaded scripts from trusted domains, ensuring performance optimization. Preloading of custom fonts and responsive design elements indicate attention to user experience. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in speed and accessibility. The technical stack is modern and aligns with industry best practices for marketing websites, though hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with potential for further optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with danonesouteze.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review danonesouteze.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.