Skip to main content

Security report for danone.fr

Danone · Retail · France

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

86/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Danone is a large multinational food and beverage company with a strong presence in France, focusing on health through nutrition. The website reflects a mature digital presence using Adobe Experience Manager and modern web technologies, providing rich content about their brands, products, and corporate initiatives. Security posture is good with HTTPS and some security best practices, but lacks explicit security policies and incident response contacts. Privacy compliance is partial with a consent mechanism but no clear privacy or cookie policies found in the analyzed content. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual and slightly reduces trustworthiness, but the website content and branding strongly indicate legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching danone.fr

This scan found 11 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
95
Email security
98
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
86

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Danone operates in the retail and manufacturing sectors, offering dairy, plant-based products, specialized nutrition, and mineral waters. The company has multiple well-known subsidiaries and brands, and maintains strong corporate social responsibility evidenced by B Corp certification. The website targets a general audience including consumers and investors, emphasizing health and sustainability. Partnerships with major events like the Tour de France and Paris 2024 Olympics enhance brand visibility. The business model is product manufacturing and distribution with a focus on quality and sustainability.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and includes some security best practices such as deferred JavaScript loading and privacy consent mechanisms. However, explicit security headers are not confirmed, and no published security or incident response policies were found. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The absence of clear security contact channels and policies is a gap in the security posture. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved with more transparency and policy publication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies clearly accessible from the homepage.
  2. Implement and verify all recommended security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options).
  3. Provide explicit security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Clarify WHOIS registration details or ensure domain WHOIS data is publicly available to improve trust.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and user rights.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Danone
Description
Danone est une entreprise qui a pour mission d’apporter la santé par l’alimentation au plus grand nombre. Grâce à la certification B corp de Danone France (Nutrition Spécialisée, Produits Laitiers et d'origine végétale, Eaux & Boissons), Danone a pour ambition d’être une entreprise pionnière pour son impact positif et sa performance économique.
Key services
Production and distribution of dairy products, Plant-based products, Specialized nutrition, Mineral water and beverages
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Helix RUM, Algolia InstantSearch, Adobe AEM (Adobe Experience Manager), JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3
Frameworks
Adobe AEM
Platforms
Adobe AEM Cloud
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Defer loading of JavaScript
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of privacy consent mechanism (TrustCommander)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe Helix RUM
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
TagCommander
Tracking pixels
TrustCommander
Marketing tools
Adobe Helix RUM, Algolia InstantSearch
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in French.
  2. Strong corporate branding and consistent messaging.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (Adobe AEM).
  4. Presence of privacy consent mechanism but no explicit privacy or cookie policy found in analyzed content.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided content.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published on the main page.
  7. WHOIS data missing or unavailable, which is unusual for a major brand domain.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
  9. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, leveraging Adobe AEM Cloud hosting, Algolia for search, and Adobe Helix for real user monitoring. The site is mobile optimized, accessible, and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading. The technical infrastructure is modern and robust, supporting a large enterprise digital presence. Opportunities exist to improve security header implementation and privacy policy integration.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with danone.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review danone.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.