Skip to main content

Security report for danone.bg

Данон България · Retail · Bulgaria

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Danone Bulgaria operates as a leading manufacturer and distributor of fresh dairy products in Bulgaria, with a strong market position since 1995. The website reflects a mature business with a comprehensive product portfolio and active social responsibility initiatives. The digital presence is professional, with good content quality and consistent branding. Technically, the site uses established frameworks like Bootstrap and jQuery, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security policies and advanced security headers. Privacy compliance is well addressed through detailed cookie policies and GDPR-aligned consent. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained, supporting Danone's brand reputation in Bulgaria.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching danone.bg

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Danone Bulgaria targets the general consumer market for fresh dairy products, leveraging its parent company's global brand and local market leadership. The business model focuses on manufacturing and retail distribution, supported by social responsibility programs that enhance brand trust. The company maintains active engagement through social media and provides nutritional education, indicating a customer-centric approach. The website's content and structure support clear communication of products and corporate values. No direct e-commerce functionality is evident, suggesting a focus on brand and information rather than direct sales. The absence of terms of service and explicit contact details on the homepage may indicate reliance on offline or separate channels for customer service.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS usage and a robust cookie consent mechanism that categorizes cookies and allows user preferences. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which could hinder rapid response to security events. The use of older jQuery version (1.12.3) may pose potential vulnerabilities if not patched. No forms on the homepage reduce immediate attack surface. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with enhanced headers, updated libraries, and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Update JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Данон България
Description
Данон Сердика, клон на Данон, от 1995 г. е лидер на българския пазар на свежи млечни продукти. В портфолиото на компанията са включени над 50 продукта с високо и постоянно качество.
Key services
Production and distribution of fresh dairy products, Social responsibility initiatives, Nutrition and health education
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.12.3, Bootstrap, Video.js
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent mechanism with detailed categories
  • HTTPS usage implied by og:url and links (https://www.danone.bg/)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Bulgarian language.
  2. Strong corporate branding and social responsibility focus.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is well implemented with detailed user options.
  4. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts published.
  5. No visible forms collecting personal data on the homepage.
  6. Social media presence is active and linked properly.
  7. No terms of service page found.
  8. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers visible in the provided HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Bootstrap framework and jQuery 1.12.3, supplemented by Video.js for media content. The HTML structure is valid and includes proper meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph). The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, likely due to use of older libraries and multiple scripts. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Cookie consent is implemented with a detailed modal allowing granular user control. No analytics scripts were explicitly detected in the provided HTML, indicating either server-side analytics or privacy-focused setup. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with danone.bg. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review danone.bg.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.