Skip to main content

Security report for danieledonati.lv

Daniele Donati · Retail · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Daniele Donati operates an e-commerce retail website focused on leather goods including women's and men's bags, wallets, and backpacks. The business targets consumers primarily in Latvia and the Baltic region, offering discounted products and maintaining physical stores in Latvia and Lithuania. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and product listings, supporting a small retail business model with a regional niche market position. Technically, the website employs common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and PhotoSwipe, with CSS frameworks for styling. The site is served over HTTPS and includes cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks advanced security headers and comprehensive accessibility features. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and cookie consent but does not publicly disclose security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. WHOIS data could not be retrieved, limiting domain trust analysis. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with additional headers and transparency. The overall risk is moderate with no critical issues detected. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, improving mobile and accessibility features, publishing security policies, and conducting regular security audits to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching danieledonati.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Daniele Donati is positioned as a small regional retailer specializing in leather accessories, leveraging both online and physical store presence in Latvia and Lithuania. The business model focuses on direct sales of discounted leather goods to consumers interested in quality bags and wallets. The website content and structure indicate a clear target audience within the Baltic region. The company demonstrates moderate digital maturity with a functional e-commerce platform but lacks advanced marketing and analytics integrations. Partnerships with payment providers Visa and Mastercard are evident, supporting secure transactions. Growth opportunities may include expanding digital marketing and improving technical infrastructure.

Security posture

The website maintains a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent banner implemented, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are publicly available, which may hinder timely security issue management. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is moderately secure but would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency to align with GDPR and NIS2 compliance requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience and compliance with accessibility standards.
  4. Conduct regular security audits and update third-party libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Improve business credibility by adding verified contact information and trust signals such as certifications or customer testimonials.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Daniele Donati
Description
Daniele Donati is a retailer specializing in leather goods such as women's and men's bags, wallets, and backpacks. The website offers a variety of discounted products targeting customers interested in quality leather accessories.
Key services
Sale of women's bags, Sale of men's bags, Sale of wallets, Physical store locations in Latvia and Lithuania
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, PhotoSwipe, Colorbox, Fontello icons, Normalize.css
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Latvian language e-commerce site selling leather goods.
  2. Site uses HTTPS and has privacy, cookie, and terms pages.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  5. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  6. No analytics or advertising scripts detected beyond basic cookie usage.
  7. Site uses common JS libraries and CSS frameworks for UI.
  8. No signs of adult or unsafe content.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional tech stack with jQuery and UI libraries like PhotoSwipe and Colorbox, supported by Normalize.css and Fontello icons. The site is served over HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers. Performance is moderate with basic mobile responsiveness. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph properties present but no structured data like JSON-LD. The site could benefit from modernization including adoption of modern frameworks, improved accessibility, and enhanced SEO practices to increase visibility and user engagement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with danieledonati.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review danieledonati.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.