Skip to main content

Security report for daniashipmanagement.com

Dania Ship Management · Transportation · N/a

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website daniashipmanagement.com represents a company likely operating in the maritime transportation sector, specializing in ship management services. However, direct access to the website content is blocked by a security mechanism involving a proof-of-work captcha challenge, preventing detailed content analysis. The domain is registered since 2017 with transparent WHOIS data, indicating a legitimate business presence. The lack of accessible content limits the ability to assess market position, detailed services, or customer engagement. Technically, the site uses advanced client-side JavaScript and Cloudfront CDN for content delivery and security challenge enforcement. Security posture is difficult to evaluate fully due to content blocking, but no immediate vulnerabilities are visible in the challenge page itself. Privacy and compliance policies are absent or inaccessible, which is a concern for GDPR and general data protection compliance. Overall, the site appears legitimate but lacks publicly accessible content and transparency in privacy and contact information, which impacts trust and usability.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching daniashipmanagement.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
50
Average
54
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the security challenge blocking access, business intelligence is limited. The domain age and WHOIS data suggest a stable registration since 2017. The company likely targets maritime industry clients needing ship management services. No visible partnerships, certifications, or detailed business information are available. The business model appears service-oriented within transportation. Absence of contact details and policies reduces credibility and customer trust. No evidence of revenue streams or growth indicators can be derived from the blocked content.

Security posture

The website employs a proof-of-work captcha challenge indicating a strong security posture against automated access and potential abuse. However, the absence of visible security headers and policies on the accessible page limits full security assessment. No SSL/TLS details are provided, but the presence of Cloudfront CDN suggests HTTPS usage. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries are detected on the challenge page. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are missing, which is a gap in security transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with visible policies and headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish clear privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  2. Provide accessible contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve security posture.
  4. Ensure the website content is accessible without excessive security challenges to improve user experience and SEO.
  5. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to demonstrate commitment to security transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. The page is a robot challenge screen with a proof-of-work captcha mechanism indicating a WAF or security challenge blocking direct access to content. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Company
Dania Ship Management
Description
The website appears to represent a company involved in ship management services, likely targeting maritime transportation sector clients.
Key services
Ship management
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Web Workers, Cloudfront CDN
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by a security challenge (proof-of-work captcha)
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies
  3. No contact information or forms are accessible
  4. No social media or external business links found
  5. Technical content indicates use of advanced client-side proof-of-work challenge
  6. No SEO or accessibility metadata present
  7. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with business domain
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses advanced JavaScript including Web Workers for a client-side proof-of-work captcha challenge, indicating a sophisticated approach to mitigating automated abuse. Hosting is via Amazon Cloudfront CDN, which supports performance and security. No CMS or frameworks are detected from the limited content. The site lacks SEO metadata and accessibility features in the accessible content. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be fully assessed due to content blocking. Technical debt or modernization needs cannot be evaluated without full content access.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with daniashipmanagement.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review daniashipmanagement.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.