Skip to main content

Security report for dabaszirgi.lv

SIA "Dabas zirgi" · Non-profit · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA "Dabas zirgi" is a Latvian social enterprise dedicated to the welfare of horses and providing related services such as horse walks, gifts for horse lovers, territory rental, and volunteer opportunities. The website serves as an informational and e-commerce platform targeting general audiences interested in animal welfare and social good. The company positions itself as a pioneer in Latvia's social enterprise sector focused on animal welfare. Technically, the website is built on the Mozello CMS platform, leveraging Amazon Cloudfront CDN for content delivery and using common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Fancybox. The site is mobile-optimized and includes basic SEO and accessibility features. Cookie consent and privacy policies indicate GDPR compliance awareness. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and implements secure form validation and cookie consent mechanisms. However, it lacks advanced security headers and does not provide explicit security or incident response policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The use of Facebook Pixel indicates moderate user tracking for marketing purposes. Overall, the website is professionally designed, trustworthy, and suitable for its social enterprise purpose. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust assessment, but the content and social presence support legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and improving accessibility compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dabaszirgi.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a small social enterprise in Latvia, focusing on horse welfare and related community services. Its business model combines social impact with e-commerce, offering services and products to horse enthusiasts and volunteers. The company leverages social media channels extensively for outreach and engagement. The market position is niche but pioneering within Latvia's social enterprise landscape. Revenue streams likely include service fees for horse walks, sales of gifts, and donations or volunteer support. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed but includes social media platforms and payment processing via Stripe. Growth indicators include active content updates and community engagement features.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling. The presence of cookie consent and privacy policy pages aligns with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating a gap in security transparency. The use of third-party tracking (Facebook Pixel) is disclosed but should be monitored for privacy compliance. Overall, the site is secure for typical user interactions but could benefit from enhanced security controls and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the site against common attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly update all third-party libraries and dependencies to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "Dabas zirgi"
Description
SIA "Dabas zirgi" is the first social enterprise in Latvia focused on animal welfare, specifically horses. They offer horse-related services including horse walks, gifts for horse lovers, territory rental, and volunteer opportunities.
Key services
Horse walks, Gifts and services related to horses, Territory rental, Volunteer work
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, Bannerplay, Mozello platform scripts, Cloudfront CDN
Platforms
Mozello CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure form validation
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Engaga
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Latvian with some English language support.
  3. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube.
  4. Uses Mozello CMS and Amazon Cloudfront CDN for hosting and delivery.
  5. Includes cookie consent banner and privacy policy page indicating GDPR awareness.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. Contact form collects name, email, and message with client-side validation.
  8. Phone number provided with clear context for contact.
  9. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries detected.
  10. Facebook Pixel used for marketing and tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Mozello CMS hosted on Amazon Cloudfront CDN, ensuring reliable content delivery. The tech stack includes jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, and custom Mozello scripts. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. SEO is basic but functional, with meta tags and canonical links present. Accessibility is basic, with some ARIA roles and labels but room for improvement. The site uses asynchronous and deferred script loading to optimize page load times. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected, but updating jQuery to a more recent version could improve security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dabaszirgi.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dabaszirgi.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.