Skip to main content

Security report for czech-aerospace.cz

Moravský letecký klastr, z.s. · Transportation · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Moravský letecký klastr, z.s. is a well-established Czech aerospace cluster association focused on fostering collaboration, innovation, and business development among aerospace companies and educational institutions primarily in the southeast Moravia region. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence, offering detailed information about services such as innovation support, marketing, and education programs. The cluster serves a large audience with over 6000 employees and significant production output, positioning itself as a key player in the Czech aerospace manufacturing sector. Technically, the website employs modern frontend technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Owl Carousel, ensuring a responsive and user-friendly experience across devices. The site includes a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements, demonstrating digital maturity in privacy compliance. However, some security best practices such as HTTP security headers are not evident, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS (implied by domain and modern standards), has no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, and implements cookie consent with detailed user controls. The WHOIS data is consistent with the business profile, enhancing trustworthiness. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, allowing full content access and analysis. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with good privacy compliance and business credibility. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response transparency, and accessibility could further enhance the security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048
  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching czech-aerospace.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
45
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
95
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention czech-aerospace.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for czech-aerospace.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The cluster operates as an essential entity in the aerospace and manufacturing sectors, facilitating innovation, networking, and market expansion for Czech aerospace companies. Its business model centers on collaboration and service provision to members, including marketing and educational programs. The cluster's large size and regional focus provide competitive advantages in the Czech aerospace ecosystem. Revenue streams likely derive from membership fees, project funding, and service contracts. The active social media presence and event calendar indicate strong engagement with stakeholders and continuous growth. Partnerships with legal and web development firms (e.g., Machin.cz, Petráš Rezek) support operational and compliance functions.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with GDPR-aligned cookie consent and privacy policies. However, the absence of explicit security headers and incident response information suggests room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks a published vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file, which could enhance transparency and incident handling. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but would benefit from formalized security documentation and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and partners.
  3. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for broader compliance.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Moravský letecký klastr, z.s.
Registration number
22875611
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Moravský letecký klastr, z.s.
Description
Moravský letecký klastr je sdružením českých leteckých podniků a vzdělávacích institucí propojených společným zájmem rozvíjet konkurenční letecký průmysl. Klastr působí v regionu jihovýchodní Moravy a centrum jeho činnosti je soustředěno do Kunovic.
Key services
Innovation support, Business opportunities expansion, Strategic collaboration networking, Marketing optimization, Educational programs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Owl Carousel, Fancybox, JavaScript
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Comprehensive cookie and privacy policies with user consent mechanisms.
  3. Active social media presence on major platforms.
  4. No visible security headers detected in HTML source.
  5. No terms of service page found.
  6. WHOIS data is consistent and supports legitimacy.
  7. No evidence of security incidents or vulnerability disclosures.
  8. Use of modern frontend technologies and responsive design.
  9. Cookie consent includes detailed categories and user control.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and widely adopted frontend technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, Owl Carousel for sliders, and Fancybox for media display. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation clarity and SEO meta tags. Hosting is managed through REG-WEBGLOBE registrar, but no explicit hosting provider or CDN details are found. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. The cookie consent implementation is robust, using JavaScript to manage user preferences and consent states. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with czech-aerospace.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review czech-aerospace.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.