Skip to main content

Security report for cykelpartner.dk

Cykelpartner.dk · Retail · Denmark

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

88/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cykelpartner.dk is a large Danish e-commerce retailer specializing in bicycles, cycling equipment, and spare parts. The website offers a broad product range with options for online ordering and delivery or in-store pickup, targeting consumers interested in cycling within Denmark. The site employs modern web technologies including UIkit for UI components and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The website is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and uses HTTPS to secure user interactions. However, the absence of explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages, as well as missing WHOIS registration data, introduces some concerns regarding transparency and domain legitimacy. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms in place, but lacks published security policies or incident response contacts. Overall, the site appears professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced compliance documentation and domain registration transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Medium

      SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

      SSL certificate expires in 76 days

      What to do: Plan SSL certificate renewal

  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Medium

      DNSSEC Not Enabled

      DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

      What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks

      • CAPEC-142
      • RFC 4033
      • RFC 4035
    • Medium

      Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

      Domain can be transferred without authorization

      What to do: Enable domain transfer lock for security

Keep watching cykelpartner.dk

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
92
Security headers
90
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
88

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the retail sector focusing on bicycles and related accessories, serving primarily the Danish market. Its business model is e-commerce retail with a strong online presence and physical store pickup options. The company leverages digital marketing and tracking tools to optimize customer engagement and sales. The lack of WHOIS data and absence of detailed company contact information on the site limits full verification of business credentials. The site’s use of multiple external marketing and analytics services indicates a mature digital marketing strategy. No clear partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data. The company’s market position appears strong within its niche, supported by a comprehensive product offering and professional website design.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS encryption and cookie consent compliance via Cookiebot. It integrates standard tracking pixels and analytics scripts, which are common in e-commerce but increase the surface for privacy concerns. No security headers were explicitly detected in the provided data, suggesting room for improvement in HTTP security configurations. The absence of a published security policy, incident response information, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates a gap in security transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by implementing security headers, publishing security policies, and providing clear incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Obtain and publish WHOIS domain registration details to enhance domain legitimacy and transparency.
  3. Implement and configure HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate security maturity.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cykelpartner.dk
Description
Cykelpartner har et kæmpe udvalg af cykler, cykeludstyr og tilbehør - bestil online og få leveret til døren eller afhent i en af vores butikker
Key services
Online sales of bicycles, Bicycle equipment, Bicycle spare parts, Delivery and in-store pickup
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot, UIkit, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
UIkit
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in provided content
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Cookiebot
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet
  5. Multiple external tracking and marketing scripts are used
  6. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification
  7. Website uses modern UIkit framework and standard analytics tools
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including UIkit for frontend UI components, and integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Cookiebot. The site is mobile-optimized and uses responsive design principles. Performance appears moderate based on the number of external scripts loaded, which could be optimized further. No CMS was explicitly detected from the HTML content. The hosting provider is not identified from the data. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved to meet higher standards. SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and Open Graph tags present. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional e-commerce experience but has opportunities for performance and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cykelpartner.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cykelpartner.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.