Skip to main content

Security report for cuponline.se

CoreIT · Transportation · Sweden

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CupOnline is a well-established Swedish online platform specializing in the administration of sports cups, tournaments, and series, primarily focused on youth hockey. Operating since 2003 and managed by Abion AB with technology support from CoreIT, it serves a large user base with over 1.5 million participants and thousands of events annually. The platform offers comprehensive services including registration, live reporting, statistics, and integration with third-party services for referees and streaming. The website content is rich and relevant, targeting sports organizers and participants, with a business model supported by partnerships and advertising revenue. Technically, the site is built on ASP.NET WebForms with CoreCMS, featuring moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is credible and functional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cuponline.se

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CupOnline holds a strong market position as the largest youth hockey cup administration platform in Sweden, leveraging a long operational history and extensive partnerships. Its business model revolves around providing online event management tools, supported by advertising and partner collaborations. The target audience includes sports clubs, event organizers, and participants, with a focus on youth sports. The company demonstrates growth through active event listings and news updates. Partnerships with companies like CoreIT, Varsego, and Cleverec enhance service offerings. The platform's reliance on ASP.NET and CoreCMS indicates a stable but somewhat dated technology stack, suggesting opportunities for modernization. The absence of direct contact details and limited privacy disclosures may impact user trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, but lacks critical security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose DNS spoofing risks. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found, indicating a reasonable baseline security. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, highlights compliance and governance gaps. The site uses forms with ASP.NET viewstate, which if not properly secured could be a risk, though no direct vulnerabilities were detected. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  2. Implement essential security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms.
  4. Add direct contact information such as company emails and phone numbers to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility to improve user experience across devices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CoreIT
Description
CupOnline provides online cup, tournament, and series administration services, enabling registration and management for participants, secretariat, and administrators. It handles 1.5 million participants in 11,200 cups since 2003, mainly focused on youth hockey.
Key services
Cup and tournament administration, Result reporting and statistics, Live event reporting, Mobile optimized interfaces, Integration with video streaming and referee services, Support and partner collaborations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
ASP.NET WebForms, JavaScript, Google Adsense, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
ASP.NET
Platforms
Windows Server (implied by ASP.NET WebForms)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of POST forms with viewstate

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found.
  3. Contact information is only via contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers visible.
  4. Website uses ASP.NET WebForms technology with CoreCMS platform.
  5. Advertising via Google Adsense is present, with moderate tracking.
  6. Mobile optimization is basic with redirect to mobile version.
  7. Security headers are missing; DNSSEC not enabled.
  8. WHOIS data shows a long-established domain with consistent registration.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on ASP.NET WebForms using CoreCMS, indicating a mature but older technology stack. The presence of Google Adsense and Google Tag Manager shows integration with common advertising and analytics tools. Performance is moderate with some optimization possible, especially for mobile devices where a redirect to a mobile version is implemented. SEO is basic with meta keywords and descriptions but lacks advanced structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are minimal. The site uses standard form submission with ASP.NET viewstate but lacks modern frontend frameworks or SPA technologies. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cuponline.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cuponline.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.