Skip to main content

Security report for ctnoma.lv

Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website ctnoma.lv represents a Latvian small business specializing in construction and road-building equipment rental services. The business offers a variety of equipment including tractors, trailers, and instruments, targeting customers in Riga and across Latvia. The site is built on the DIRcms platform and uses common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and bxSlider to provide interactive features. The website content is relevant and professionally presented, though it lacks comprehensive contact details and privacy-related documentation. From a technical perspective, the site employs standard web technologies but shows limited evidence of advanced security measures such as HTTPS enforcement or security headers. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates a gap in compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, suggesting minimal user tracking. Security posture is moderate to low due to missing HTTPS confirmation and lack of visible security headers. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting the ability to verify domain registration legitimacy. Overall, the site appears functional and relevant for its business purpose but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures. Strategically, the business should prioritize implementing HTTPS, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and improving contact transparency to build trust and meet regulatory requirements. Regular updates to third-party libraries and adding security headers would further strengthen the security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ctnoma.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation and manufacturing sectors, focusing on equipment rental for construction and road-building. Its business model revolves around renting out machinery and tools to contractors and individuals in Latvia. The website targets a general audience interested in construction equipment rental, primarily within Latvia. The lack of detailed company information and absence of social media presence suggests a small-scale operation with limited digital marketing efforts. The partnership ecosystem includes DIRcms as the CMS provider. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not discernible from the website content. The company could improve market positioning by enhancing online presence and transparency.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic. The website lacks visible HTTPS enforcement and security headers, which are critical for protecting user data and preventing common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR requirements. There is no evidence of an incident response plan or security contact channels. The use of outdated JavaScript libraries could pose vulnerabilities if not regularly updated. The absence of analytics and tracking reduces privacy risks but also limits business intelligence. Overall, the security posture exposes the business to moderate risk, especially regarding data protection and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear and multiple contact channels including phone numbers and physical address for trust and compliance.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact to improve security readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Ceļu būves un celtniecības tehnikas noma. Piedāvājam iznomāt ceļu būves un celtniecības tehniku plašā sortimentā jebkurā nomas punktā Rīgā un Latvijā
Key services
Ceļu būves tehnikas noma, Traktortehnikas noma, Autotransporta noma, Treilera pakalpojumi, Instrumentu noma
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, bxSlider, Superfish menu, Fancybox
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy found on the site.
  4. Contact information limited to email links; no phone or physical address found.
  5. Website uses DIRcms platform and common JavaScript libraries.
  6. No security headers or HTTPS status visible from provided data.
  7. Content is relevant to construction equipment rental in Latvia.
  8. No social media or external business-related links detected.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy pages found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses DIRcms as its content management system, combined with JavaScript libraries like jQuery, jQuery UI, bxSlider, Superfish, and Fancybox for UI and interactive elements. The site design is professional with good navigation and content relevance but shows only basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading. The absence of modern frameworks or platforms suggests potential for modernization. No hosting provider information was detected. Technical debt may exist due to lack of visible security enhancements and missing compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ctnoma.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ctnoma.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.