Skip to main content

Security report for csps-hk.cz

CSPS o.p.s. · Non-profit · Czech Republic

High risk. 13 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CSPS o.p.s. is a Czech non-profit organization focused on providing social services such as senior care, marriage and family counseling, and foster family support. The organization targets seniors, families, and foster families primarily in the Hradec Králové region. The website is currently under construction but provides essential contact information for key personnel and service lines. The business model is typical for a small non-profit social service provider with a local/regional market position. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and uses common web technologies such as Font Awesome and Google Fonts. The site loads a background image dynamically from Unsplash and includes basic styling. However, SEO optimization is minimal, and mobile optimization is basic. No advanced frameworks or hosting details are evident from the content. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks important security headers such as Content Security Policy and X-Frame-Options. There are no visible privacy or cookie policies, which is a compliance gap given GDPR requirements in the Czech Republic. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal user tracking. The security posture is weak but without critical vulnerabilities detected in the visible content. Overall, the website is functional but basic, with room for improvement in security, privacy compliance, and content richness. The domain registration data supports legitimacy, showing a long-standing registration consistent with the organization's profile.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

13 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching csps-hk.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CSPS o.p.s. operates as a small non-profit entity in the social services sector, focusing on senior care and family counseling. Its competitive advantage lies in localized service delivery with named contacts and direct phone lines, enhancing trust and accessibility. The business model relies on direct service provision rather than commercial revenue streams. Growth indicators are limited due to the basic web presence. The partnership ecosystem is not evident from the website. Strategic observations suggest the organization could benefit from enhanced digital presence and compliance documentation to improve stakeholder confidence.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low to moderate. The presence of HTTPS is positive, but the absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates gaps in best practices. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency. The lack of analytics reduces privacy risks but also limits insights into user behavior. Compliance with GDPR is questionable due to missing policies. The organization should prioritize implementing security headers, privacy documentation, and formal incident response contacts to improve its security culture and compliance posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  3. Enhance website content and navigation to improve user experience and SEO.
  4. Establish and publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure contacts.
  5. Regularly update WordPress and plugins and consider deploying a WAF or security plugin.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CSPS o.p.s.
Description
Non-profit organization providing social services including senior care, marriage and family counseling, and foster family support in the Czech Republic.
Key services
Senior care services, Marriage and family counseling, Support for foster families
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Unsplash API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is under construction with limited content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies present.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with multiple phone numbers and emails.
  4. No security headers detected; security posture is weak.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. Uses WordPress CMS with common external resources.
  7. No advertising or marketing tools detected.
  8. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with standard external resources like Font Awesome and Google Fonts. It dynamically loads a background image from Unsplash via API. The site uses minified CSS cached by a WordPress caching plugin. Performance is moderate with basic mobile responsiveness. No advanced frameworks or hosting details are visible. The site lacks SEO optimization and accessibility features. Technical debt is low but modernization opportunities include improving SEO, accessibility, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with csps-hk.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review csps-hk.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.