Skip to main content

Security report for csit.sport

International Workers and Amateurs in Sports Confederation · Non-profit · Austria

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The International Workers and Amateurs in Sports Confederation (CSIT) is a well-established non-profit organization founded in 1913, focused on promoting multi-sport activities based on the labor movement's historic ideals. It holds recognition from the International Olympic Committee and maintains partnerships with numerous international sports bodies. The website reflects a medium-sized organization with a clear social mission and active engagement through events, championships, and sustainability initiatives. Technically, the website uses a basic Apache server setup with standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript but lacks modern security configurations such as a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, which is a critical vulnerability. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms and terms of service pages indicates partial privacy compliance. Overall, the site is content-rich and professionally presented but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of csit.sport. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching csit.sport

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
20
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CSIT operates in the non-profit sports sector, targeting workers and amateur athletes globally. Its business model revolves around organizing international sports events, promoting fair play, and supporting social causes like sustainability and human rights. The organization leverages a broad partnership network including governmental bodies and international sports federations, enhancing its market position and credibility. The website serves as a hub for news, event information, and member engagement, supporting growth and community building. Revenue streams likely include membership fees, event sponsorships, and EU co-funded projects. The digital presence is consistent with its mission but could benefit from enhanced digital marketing and analytics capabilities.

Security posture

The website's security posture is weak due to the lack of HTTPS and a valid SSL certificate, exposing users to potential data interception risks. No advanced security headers or mechanisms like HSTS, OCSP stapling, or session resumption are implemented. While no known vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE are detected, the absence of modern TLS protocols and DNSSEC reduces overall security. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent or terms of service. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident. Immediate remediation is necessary to secure communications and comply with data protection regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce HTTPS site-wide to secure user data.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or 1.3) and security headers such as HSTS, Content-Security-Policy, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner and clearly publish terms of service to improve privacy compliance.
  4. Establish an incident response contact channel (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email) and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy.
  5. Enhance website performance and accessibility by optimizing resources and ensuring compliance with accessibility standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on an Apache server with a single IPv4 address and uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected. The DNS setup lacks DNSSEC and CAA records, which could improve domain security. Performance metrics are not available, but the page size and resource count suggest a moderate load. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO practices are evident through meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the absence of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols is a significant technical risk. The site uses external resources for stylesheets and scripts hosted on its own domain. Social media integration is extensive but no advanced analytics or tracking scripts are detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 48/100High36 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with csit.sport. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review csit.sport.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.