Skip to main content

Security report for crystalrose.lv

Crystalrose.lv · Retail · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Crystalrose.lv is a small local e-commerce business specializing in flower delivery and related gift services in Rēzekne, Latvia. The website offers a variety of flower compositions, bouquets, flower boxes, gifts, and equipment rental, targeting local consumers seeking quality floral products. The business emphasizes fresh seasonal flowers and personalized service with professional florists. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, utilizing common web technologies such as jQuery and Font Awesome. The site is mobile-optimized and presents products professionally, though performance is moderate and SEO is basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks security headers and explicit privacy or cookie consent mechanisms, indicating partial GDPR compliance. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust verification. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy for its business scope but could improve security and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching crystalrose.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail sector focused on floral products and services, serving primarily the local market in Rēzekne and surrounding areas. Its business model is direct-to-consumer e-commerce with an emphasis on quality and seasonal offerings. The website shows clear contact information and social media presence, supporting customer engagement. The lack of WHOIS data and limited privacy disclosures suggest room for improvement in transparency and compliance. The company appears to be a small-sized local business without visible parent or subsidiary relationships. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital marketing and compliance improvements.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of cookie consent and detailed privacy policies indicates partial GDPR compliance, which is a risk for European businesses. Incident response and security policy information are not present, suggesting limited formal security governance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish explicit privacy and security policies detailing data handling and protection measures.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Establish incident response contact channels and security governance documentation to improve trust and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Crystalrose.lv
Description
Online flower delivery service based in Rēzekne, Latvia, offering flower compositions, bouquets, flower boxes, gifts, and equipment rental with local and seasonal flowers.
Key services
Flower compositions, Flower delivery, Flower boxes, Gifts, Equipment rental
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, Font Awesome, Google Fonts
Frameworks
WooCommerce
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Jetpack WordPress Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
WordPress.com Stats (Jetpack)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress WooCommerce e-commerce site for flower delivery in Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian language targeting local customers.
  3. No privacy or cookie consent banners detected, indicating partial GDPR compliance.
  4. Contact phone number and physical address clearly displayed.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram.
  6. No visible security headers in HTML source.
  7. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  8. No signs of adult or malicious content.
  9. Site uses HTTPS with valid SSL.
  10. No forms collecting sensitive personal data except search form and WooCommerce checkout (not fully analyzed here).
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality. It uses standard web technologies including jQuery, Font Awesome icons, and Google Fonts. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from its own domain and trusted external sources. Performance is moderate with deferred JS loading and responsive design. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA labels and semantic HTML but could be improved. SEO is basic with meta tags and canonical links but lacks advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is typical for a small e-commerce site but could benefit from performance and SEO enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with crystalrose.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review crystalrose.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.