Skip to main content

Security report for cruiselines.lv

Cruiseline Latvia · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cruiseline Latvia is a specialized travel agency focused on providing cruise vacation options primarily to Latvian-speaking customers. The business offers ocean and river cruises, group cruise options, and exclusive deals with a user-friendly search interface to filter cruises by destination, cruise line, ship, dates, departure ports, and duration. The website is built on WordPress using modern plugins for multilingual support, SEO, and user interface enhancements. The technical infrastructure is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though some improvements in accessibility and performance could be made. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy assessment. Overall, the site presents as a legitimate small business travel agency with room for enhanced privacy and security compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cruiselines.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation and hospitality sectors, targeting cruise travelers in Latvia. Its business model centers on online bookings and cruise deal promotions, leveraging partnerships with cruise lines such as Explora Journeys, MSC Cruises, and others. The presence of social media channels and structured data indicates a focus on digital marketing and customer engagement. The lack of detailed WHOIS data and privacy policies suggests the business is small and possibly newly established or with limited regulatory disclosures online. The site’s multilingual capabilities and extensive cruise search options indicate a customer-centric approach aiming to capture a niche market segment interested in cruises.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, it lacks important security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others that help mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The site uses common third-party libraries and plugins, none of which appear outdated or vulnerable from the provided data. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing security headers, formal privacy notices, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common attacks.
  3. Configure Google Analytics properly or remove the plugin if not used to avoid unnecessary data collection.
  4. Establish and publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure contacts to improve security transparency and readiness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update third-party plugins and libraries to maintain a secure environment.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cruiseline Latvia
Description
Cruiseline Latvia is a travel business specializing in cruise vacations, offering ocean and river cruises with a focus on multiple destinations, group cruises, and exclusive deals. The site targets Latvian-speaking customers and provides a search interface for cruise options by destination, cruise line, ship, dates, departure ports, and duration.
Key services
Ocean cruises, River cruises, Group cruises, Cruise deals, Cruise line information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 5, Slick Carousel, FontAwesome, Litepicker, Leaflet, Yoast SEO, WPML (multilingual plugin), AddToAny (social sharing), Cruiseappy plugin
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (not configured)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Latvian language travel agency specializing in cruises.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected.
  4. Contact phone number is clearly displayed in header.
  5. Site uses WordPress with common plugins for SEO, multilingual support, and UI.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data.
  7. HTTPS is enabled and used site-wide.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram.
  10. Google Analytics plugin present but not configured.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap 5 for responsive design, jQuery for scripting, and various plugins for SEO (Yoast), multilingual support (WPML), and UI components (Slick Carousel, Litepicker). The site loads multiple external resources from trusted CDNs and social media platforms. Performance is moderate with some optimization opportunities. Mobile optimization is good, ensuring usability across devices. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA roles and better keyboard navigation support. The site does not expose sensitive data and uses HTTPS, but lacks advanced security headers. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small business site but can benefit from security and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cruiselines.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cruiselines.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.