Skip to main content

Security report for cross-traffic.com

CROSS Zlín, a.s. · Transportation · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CROSS Zlín, a.s. is a Czech Republic-based company specializing in intelligent transportation systems, including weigh-in-motion, traffic control, parking systems, road weather monitoring, and data collection solutions. Established in 1994, the company has a strong market presence with over 200 employees and multiple innovation awards, positioning itself as a key player in smart city and transportation technology sectors. Their website reflects a professional and comprehensive digital presence with detailed case studies and references, targeting municipalities and transportation authorities globally. Technically, the website uses a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and a proprietary CMS (Studio9 webManager), delivering a good user experience with mobile optimization and SEO best practices. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though the absence of security headers and incident response information suggests room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, warranting further verification. Overall, the company demonstrates a mature business and digital footprint with moderate risk due to domain registration opacity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: RPC

      Port 135 (RPC) is publicly accessible - RPC - Windows RPC endpoint

      What to do: Consider restricting access to RPC or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cross-traffic.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
90
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
85
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CROSS operates in the transportation technology sector, focusing on smart city solutions and traffic management systems. Their business model is B2B, serving government entities and urban planners. The company leverages innovation as a competitive advantage, evidenced by multiple Intertraffic innovation awards. Their revenue streams likely include hardware sales, software licensing, and service contracts for installation and maintenance. The company maintains partnerships with technology providers such as OptiWIM, Metsense, and Invipo, enhancing their solution offerings. Growth indicators include a new development center opened in 2023 and international project references. The company’s strategic positioning emphasizes innovation, quality, and comprehensive traffic solutions, targeting a global market with a strong foothold in Europe.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent banner with granular controls, indicating awareness of privacy and security compliance. However, the absence of common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection reduces the overall security posture. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published incident response policy or security contact information limits transparency and readiness perception. GDPR compliance is well addressed via a dedicated privacy policy page. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a significant concern, as it impacts trust and legitimacy. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with clear areas for enhancement, especially in security headers and incident response transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Maintain and regularly update privacy and cookie policies to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CROSS Zlín, a.s.
Description
We are a global innovator in the field of transportation systems, weigh-in-motion and the implementation of smart city solutions.
Key services
Weigh-in-Motion systems, Traffic Control systems, Parking Systems, Road Weather monitoring, Data Collection solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.4.0, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (UA-3415403-14), Owl Carousel, SVG icons
Frameworks
Studio9 webManager CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Seznam Retargeting
Marketing tools
Mailchimp (newsletter subscription)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Professional and consistent branding with clear business focus on transportation technology.
  3. Comprehensive cookie and privacy policies with GDPR compliance.
  4. No security headers detected; opportunity for improvement in security posture.
  5. WHOIS data missing, which reduces trustworthiness score.
  6. Multiple references and case studies demonstrate real-world deployments.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, LinkedIn.
  8. Newsletter subscription integrated with Mailchimp.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Studio9 webManager CMS platform, utilizing jQuery 3.4.0 and Owl Carousel for interactive elements. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for tracking and analytics. The site loads external scripts from trusted domains and uses SVG icons for scalable graphics. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site lacks advanced security headers and incident response mechanisms. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and functional but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cross-traffic.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cross-traffic.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.