Skip to main content

Security report for crashday.cz

Ústav soudního inženýrství Vysokého učení technického v Brně · Transportation · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website crashday.cz represents a small academic research team from the Institute of Forensic Engineering at Brno University of Technology, specializing in traffic accident analysis and automotive crash testing. The site serves as an informational platform showcasing their work and research activities. The technical infrastructure is based on a modern WordPress CMS with standard plugins and themes, hosted by WEDOS, a Czech hosting provider. The site is accessible via HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure communication. However, the site lacks critical privacy and cookie policies, as well as explicit contact information, which limits its compliance with GDPR and general privacy best practices. Security posture is moderate with room for improvement in security headers and incident response disclosures. Overall, the site is professionally presented but minimalistic in content and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching crashday.cz

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates within the transportation and education sectors, focusing on forensic analysis of road accidents and automotive crash testing. Their market position is niche and academic, targeting researchers, legal experts, and possibly governmental or insurance entities interested in accident reconstruction. The business model is research and expert service-oriented, likely funded through academic or governmental grants. The website does not reveal revenue streams or partnerships explicitly. The multilingual support indicates an intent to reach both Czech and international audiences. The lack of commercial elements or advertising suggests a non-profit or academic focus. The domain age and registration data support the legitimacy and continuity of the operation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is enforced, and the WordPress installation is up to date, reducing exposure to known vulnerabilities. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could hinder timely reporting and mitigation of security issues. No forms or input fields are present that collect sensitive data, reducing attack surface. The site does not implement cookie consent mechanisms, which is a compliance risk under GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a low-risk academic site but should be enhanced to meet best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve security posture.
  3. Provide explicit contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security incident reporting.
  4. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident response.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain platform security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ústav soudního inženýrství Vysokého učení technického v Brně
Description
Tým expertů na analýzu silničních nehod z Ústavu soudního inženýrství Vysokého učení technického v Brně, provádějící také nárazové zkoušky automobilů v rámci výzkumu.
Key services
Traffic accident analysis, Automotive crash testing, Research in forensic engineering
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.0.2, jQuery 3.6.0, Bootstrap 3/4 (based on bootstrap.min.js), Font Awesome 4.7.0, Google Fonts (Raleway, Open Sans), OnePress theme, WPGlobus plugin (multilingual support)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of latest WordPress version (6.0.2)
  • Defer loading of emoji script

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based academic/research site focused on traffic accident analysis.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the main page.
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  5. Site uses HTTPS with valid SSL and modern WordPress version.
  6. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  7. Multilingual support for Czech and English via WPGlobus plugin.
  8. Content is minimal but relevant to the research team and their work.
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.0.2 using the OnePress theme and several standard plugins including WPGlobus for multilingual support. It uses jQuery 3.6.0 and Bootstrap for responsive design, along with Font Awesome for icons. Google Fonts are used for typography. The site is hosted by WEDOS, a Czech hosting provider, consistent with the domain registration. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading for emojis to optimize speed. The site is mobile optimized and accessible at a basic level. SEO optimization is minimal but present with canonical tags and RSS feeds. There is no evidence of advanced analytics or tracking services. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for a small academic site but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with crashday.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review crashday.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.