Skip to main content

Security report for cpstest.click

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website cpstest.click offers a free online service focused on measuring and training users' mouse click speed, primarily targeting gamers and casual users interested in improving their click rate. The site provides multiple click speed tests, reaction time tests, and related gaming tools, supported by advertising revenue through Google Adsense and related ad services. The content is well structured, multilingual, and optimized for mobile devices, providing a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant gaming-related content. From a technical perspective, the site uses modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with integration of Google Tag Manager and DoubleClick for analytics and advertising. The domain is registered with a reputable registrar and uses Cloudflare DNS, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers, which are areas for improvement. The site is served over HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. Security posture is moderate; while HTTPS is enforced and domain transfer protection is enabled, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers reduces the overall security maturity. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy and terms of service present, but no visible cookie consent mechanism despite use of tracking scripts. Contact information is limited to a contact form with no direct emails or phone numbers, which may affect user trust. Overall, the website is a legitimate, small-scale online gaming utility with a moderate security and privacy posture. Strategic improvements in security headers, DNSSEC implementation, and privacy compliance would enhance trust and security. The site is safe for general audiences with no adult or questionable content detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Domain Expires Soon

      Domain expires in 18 days

      What to do: Renew domain registration before expiration

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cpstest.click

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
80
Email security
65
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

cpstest.click operates in the niche market of online gaming utilities, specifically focusing on click speed testing and training tools. Its business model relies on free access supported by advertising revenue, primarily through Google Adsense. The target audience includes gamers and casual users seeking to improve their mouse click speed and reaction times. The site offers a variety of related tests and games, positioning itself as a specialized tool for gaming performance enhancement. The domain age and registration details align with the business's founding year, indicating a consistent and transparent operation. However, the lack of direct contact details and limited business information suggest a small-scale operation without extensive corporate infrastructure or partnerships.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection active. However, the absence of DNSSEC leaves the domain vulnerable to DNS spoofing attacks. No explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options were detected, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file, limiting transparency in security incident handling. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism despite tracking scripts. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of malware or phishing. Overall, while the site is not critically vulnerable, there are notable gaps that should be addressed to improve security maturity and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to protect against common web attacks.
  3. Add a clear cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and inform users about tracking.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  5. Provide direct contact information such as a company email address to enhance trust and facilitate communication.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Free online game to test mouse click speed and calculate clicks per second (CPS). Offers various click speed tests and training tools to improve gaming performance.
Key services
CPS test, Jitter click test, Kohi click test, Spacebar clicker, Scroll test, Coreball game, AIM Trainer, Reaction time test, Typing speed test, User history tracking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Adsense, Google Tag Manager, Google DoubleClick, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense, Google DoubleClick
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides a niche gaming utility focused on click speed testing.
  2. Content is well structured with multiple language support.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via form only.
  4. Advertising is present via Google Adsense and related Google ad services.
  5. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected despite use of tracking scripts.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
  8. WHOIS data is transparent and domain is relatively new but consistent with business.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with integration of Google advertising and analytics services. It is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS, providing some level of protection and performance optimization. The site is mobile optimized and uses preloading for fonts and stylesheets to improve performance. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates technical debt in security best practices. The site does not appear to use a CMS or major web frameworks, suggesting a custom or lightweight implementation. Performance is moderate, with ads potentially impacting load times. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small-scale online gaming utility but could benefit from security and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cpstest.click. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cpstest.click.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.