Skip to main content

Security report for coqui.shoes

COQUI WORLD s.r.o. · Retail · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

COQUI WORLD s.r.o. operates the website www.coqui.shoes, an e-commerce platform specializing in footwear including clogs, slippers, sandals, and accessories for women, men, and children. The brand emphasizes comfort, family orientation, and a relaxed lifestyle, supported by a multilingual website and active social media presence. The company positions itself as a medium-sized retail business with a focus on quality and sustainability. Technically, the website uses modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 3.7.1 and includes cookie consent mechanisms, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, with good navigation and professional design. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure, though security headers are not explicitly detected. Privacy compliance is strong with clear privacy and cookie policies and GDPR adherence. However, WHOIS data is malformed and unavailable, limiting transparency about domain registration details. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally managed but could improve transparency and security header implementation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching coqui.shoes

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets a broad consumer base interested in comfortable and stylish footwear for all ages, leveraging an e-commerce model with direct online sales. The multilingual support and regional related domains suggest international market reach. The partnership with Plugo.cz for web development and marketing indicates a strategic approach to digital presence. The business model focuses on product quality, sustainability, and brand experience, supported by collections and lookbooks. Revenue streams are primarily from online sales of shoes and accessories. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the site suggests a preference for controlled communication channels via forms. The company maintains active social media channels to engage customers and build brand loyalty.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable scripts were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. No security policy or incident response contacts are published, which could hinder vulnerability reporting and incident management. The malformed WHOIS data reduces domain transparency, which is a minor risk factor. Overall, the security posture is adequate for an e-commerce retailer but could be enhanced by implementing recommended security headers and publishing a security.txt file.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve trust.
  3. Improve transparency by ensuring WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available or justified by privacy protection policies.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
COQUI WORLD s.r.o.
Description
Comfortable summer clogs, slippers and flip-flops for family. Enjoy great feeling with our Coqui shoes.
Key services
Footwear sales, Accessories sales, Online shopping platform
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, Custom JavaScript, CSS, CookieConsent v3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, DoubleClick
Marketing tools
CookieConsent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear navigation and multilingual support.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented with consent mechanisms.
  4. No direct company emails or phone numbers found in visible content; contact is via form.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain registration transparency.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube supports brand legitimacy.
  7. No security.txt or explicit incident response contacts found.
  8. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected in HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack with jQuery 3.7.1 and custom scripts. It employs cookie consent scripts to comply with privacy regulations. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices, with preloading of fonts and images to improve performance. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format for search engines. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and more detailed technical documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with coqui.shoes. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review coqui.shoes.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.