Skip to main content

Security report for coop.ee

Coop Eesti · Retail · Estonia

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Coop Eesti is the oldest and largest retail cooperative group in Estonia, operating approximately 330 stores with around 6000 employees and serving about 70,000 client-owners. The website reflects a mature retail business with a cooperative model focused on Estonian consumers. Technically, the site is built on Drupal 10, integrating modern analytics and advertising tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Adform, with a robust cookie consent mechanism ensuring GDPR compliance. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and appropriate security headers, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly available. Overall, the site is professional, secure, and compliant, supporting Coop Eesti's market position as a trusted retail cooperative.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching coop.ee

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Coop Eesti holds a dominant position in the Estonian retail sector as a cooperative group. Its business model leverages regional consumer cooperatives to operate a large network of stores. The company targets Estonian consumers with a focus on retail goods and services. The website's integration with multiple partner domains and use of advanced marketing and analytics tools indicates a sophisticated digital marketing strategy. The absence of explicit contact details on the main site suggests customer interactions may be handled via partner portals or offline channels. The cooperative structure and long history support strong community ties and brand loyalty.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The use of reputable third-party services is well managed with cookie consent and privacy notices. However, the lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. Compliance with GDPR is evident through cookie management and privacy policy. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced incident response visibility.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information on the website.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Enhance website accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards.
  4. Provide clear and verified contact information for security and general inquiries.
  5. Regularly review third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Coop Eesti
Description
100% Eesti tarbijatele endile kuuluv Coop Eesti (COOP Estonia) on vanim ja suurim jaekaubanduse valdkonnas ühiselt tegutsev grupp Eestis. Selle nime all toimetab 19 iseseisvat piirkondlikku tarbijate ühistut kokku ligi 330 kaupluse, 6000 töötaja ja ca 70 000 klientomanikuga.
Key services
Retail stores, Consumer cooperative services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Font Awesome, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Hotjar, Adform tracking
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Adform, Meta Platforms, Inc.
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern CMS Drupal 10
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy present
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML content
  4. Multiple reputable third-party analytics and advertising services integrated
  5. Good security headers and HTTPS configuration
  6. No signs of WAF blocking or content restriction
  7. Business is a large retail cooperative group in Estonia
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  9. Content is safe and appropriate for general audience
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10, a modern and secure CMS platform, supported by Font Awesome for icons and integrated with Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Hotjar, and Adform for analytics and marketing. The site uses HTTPS with strong security headers, indicating good technical hygiene. Performance is moderate, with mobile optimization and SEO practices in place. The presence of multiple external tracking and advertising domains suggests a complex digital marketing infrastructure. Technical risks include dependency on third-party scripts and the need for continuous monitoring of these integrations to avoid privacy or security issues.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with coop.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review coop.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.