Skip to main content

Security report for contechs.co.uk

Contechs · Transportation · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Contechs is a professional service provider specializing in automotive design and engineering, targeting global automotive OEMs. The company offers innovative design and engineering services from concept through to production, positioning itself as a key player in the transportation sector. The website reflects a medium-sized business with a consistent brand presence and good quality content tailored to its B2B audience. Technically, the website employs modern analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Coralogix RUM, and uses Bootstrap for responsive design. However, the absence of explicit privacy and terms of service policies, as well as missing WHOIS registration data, limits the ability to fully verify the business's legitimacy and compliance posture. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms but lacks visible security headers and incident response contacts, indicating room for improvement in security best practices. Overall, the website is professional and functional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching contechs.co.uk

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Contechs operates in the automotive design and engineering sector, serving global OEMs with end-to-end services from concept to production. The business model is B2B, focusing on providing specialized engineering expertise. The website suggests a medium-sized company with a solid market position based on innovation and service quality. The lack of detailed company registration or contact information on the site and in WHOIS data suggests a need for improved transparency to strengthen trust. The use of client logos and testimonials indicates an established client base. The company leverages modern digital marketing and analytics tools to understand and engage its audience, but does not publicly disclose privacy or security policies, which may impact compliance with regulations such as GDPR.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism in place, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security robustness. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits the ability to respond to security incidents effectively. The lack of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which could be a risk factor. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements in transparency, policy publication, and technical security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Implement and configure security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen website security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts and data protection officer details.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and trust.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Contechs
Description
Contechs provides innovative design and engineering services to global automotive OEMs, from concept to production.
Key services
Automotive design, Engineering services, Concept to production support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 3.2.0, Google Tag Manager (gtag.js), Microsoft Clarity, Coralogix RUM SDK
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by canonical URL
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Coralogix RUM
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing tools
Coralogix RUM
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or domain may not be registered.
  3. Website uses modern tracking and analytics tools.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via OneTrust.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in the provided content.
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  7. Website content is focused on automotive design and engineering services.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No explicit security policy or incident response contact information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Bootstrap 3.2.0 for responsive design and includes modern analytics and tracking technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Coralogix RUM SDK. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility features are basic but present. The hosting provider and CMS are not explicitly identified. The website's technical implementation is solid but could benefit from updated frameworks and enhanced security configurations. No critical technical vulnerabilities were detected in the analyzed content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with contechs.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review contechs.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.