Skip to main content

Security report for confidentgirlsfoundation.com.au

Confident Girls Foundation · Non-profit · Australia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Confident Girls Foundation is an Australian non-profit organization dedicated to empowering vulnerable and marginalized girls through netball and community support services. The organization focuses on providing opportunities for girls to overcome disadvantage by facilitating netball programs, supplying equipment, and connecting participants with counseling, education, and employment assistance. The website reflects a well-established entity with clear mission, vision, and values, supported by partnerships such as the Australian Sports Foundation. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and tracking tools, offering good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data, though improvements can be made by implementing security headers and a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with basic privacy standards, serving a general audience without any adult or questionable content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching confidentgirlsfoundation.com.au

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector, targeting girls and young women facing social and economic disadvantages. Its business model revolves around community engagement, fundraising, and partnerships with corporate and charitable entities. The presence of donation links and partnership pages indicates active fundraising and collaboration efforts. The website's content and structure suggest a small-sized organization with a focused mission and a growing digital presence. Social media integration and transparent contact information enhance credibility and outreach. The partnership with the Australian Sports Foundation is a key strategic asset, facilitating fundraising and donor engagement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. It uses reputable WordPress plugins and tracking tools like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a security.txt file or incident response contact information limits transparency in vulnerability reporting. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected, which may affect GDPR compliance for EU visitors.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and incident response contact details to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate risks from vulnerable components.
  5. Enhance privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR compliance and data retention policies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Confident Girls Foundation
Registration number
ABN: 62 614 643 882
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Confident Girls Foundation
Description
Providing opportunities for girls and young women to overcome disadvantage through netball.
Key services
Netball programs for marginalised girls, Provision of equipment, Counselling services, Educational guidance, Employment assistance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Google Fonts (Karla), Slider Revolution, Mailchimp plugin, Contact Form 7, Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics, jQuery UI Datepicker
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure plugins

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Mailchimp
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed WordPress site for a non-profit organization
  2. Clear mission and values focused on empowering girls through netball
  3. Contact information is transparent and includes physical address, phone, and email
  4. Social media integration is comprehensive and consistent
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  6. No cookie consent mechanism detected, which may affect GDPR compliance
  7. Security headers are not explicitly detected, room for improvement
  8. Use of common tracking and marketing tools like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern theme and several plugins including Yoast SEO, Slider Revolution, Mailchimp integration, and Contact Form 7. It uses Google Fonts for typography and jQuery UI for datepicker functionality. Tracking is implemented via Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from its own domain and trusted CDNs. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. Accessibility features are basic but present. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with confidentgirlsfoundation.com.au. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review confidentgirlsfoundation.com.au.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.