Skip to main content

Security report for concordiacosmetic.lv

Concordia Cosmetic · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Concordia Cosmetic is a Latvian-based distributor and retailer specializing in luxury class cosmetic products, serving Latvia and the Baltic states for nearly a decade. The website showcases a professional e-commerce platform built on WordPress and WooCommerce, featuring prominent luxury brands such as Natura Bissé, Mary Cohr, Anne Semonin, and Bioskin Dermolife cosmetic. The site is well-structured with good design quality and mobile optimization, targeting consumers interested in high-end skincare products. Technically, the site leverages modern plugins and frameworks including Elementor, Mailchimp, and Yoast SEO, ensuring a functional and SEO-friendly experience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though security headers and detailed privacy policies are missing, representing areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain trust evaluation, but the site presents as legitimate and professional. Overall, the site scores well on content quality and technical implementation but should enhance privacy compliance and contact transparency to improve business credibility and security assurance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching concordiacosmetic.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
40
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail sector focusing on luxury cosmetic products, positioning itself as a key distributor in Latvia and the Baltic region. Its business model revolves around product distribution and direct online sales via an e-commerce platform. The target market includes consumers seeking premium skincare and beauty products. The website's use of recognized brands and professional presentation supports its market credibility. Marketing tools such as Mailchimp and Google Analytics are employed for customer engagement and data analysis. However, the lack of explicit privacy policies and contact details may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance. The company appears to be a small-sized entity with a focused niche, with no visible parent or subsidiary relationships. The social media presence is indicated but some links appear incomplete or placeholders, suggesting potential areas for digital marketing enhancement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communication. A cookie consent banner compliant with GDPR principles is present, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found, limiting transparency and preparedness. The site uses popular and regularly updated plugins, but no explicit evidence of vulnerability scanning or security hardening is visible. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small e-commerce site but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages with clear links accessible from the homepage.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against web vulnerabilities.
  3. Add explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  4. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security transparency.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate risks from outdated software.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Concordia Cosmetic
Description
“Concordia Cosmetic” ir profesionālo un mājas kopšanas luksusa klases kosmētisko produktu izplatītājs Latvijā un Baltijas valstīs jau gandrīdz 10 gadus. Izplatam tādus zīmolus kā: Natura Bissé, Mary Cohr, Anne Semonin un Bioskin Dermolife cosmetic.
Key services
Distribution of luxury cosmetic products, Retail sales via website
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Elementor, jQuery, Swiper.js, Mailchimp plugin, Cookie Law Info plugin, Yoast SEO
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, WordPress.com Stats
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via gtag.js), WordPress.com Stats
Marketing tools
Mailchimp
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress WooCommerce e-commerce site selling luxury cosmetic products.
  2. Content is in Latvian language targeting Latvian and Baltic customers.
  3. Cookie consent banner is implemented with detailed categories.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  6. Social media links present but some URLs appear malformed or placeholders.
  7. Site uses modern frontend technologies and SEO plugins.
  8. No obvious security headers detected in the HTML content.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust assessment.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality and Elementor for page building. It uses jQuery and Swiper.js for interactive elements and sliders. Mailchimp integration supports marketing campaigns, and Yoast SEO plugin optimizes search engine visibility. The site loads external resources from Google Fonts and WordPress.com stats. Performance is moderate with some optimization in image sizes and responsive design. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site lacks advanced security headers and detailed privacy documentation. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and suitable for a small to medium e-commerce business but can benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with concordiacosmetic.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review concordiacosmetic.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.