Skip to main content

Security report for comply-app.com

Comply · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Comply is a technology company founded in 2019 that provides a SaaS platform focused on automating website compliance, particularly GDPR and privacy regulations. Their service replaces manual compliance checklists with automated website scanning and consent management tools, targeting businesses and compliance professionals. The company positions itself as a niche provider in the compliance automation market, leveraging modern web technologies and integrations such as LinkedIn analytics to enhance marketing and user insights. Technically, the website is built on Vue.js, hosted with Azure DNS, and employs HTTPS with good security headers, although DNSSEC is not enabled. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security posture is solid with no critical vulnerabilities detected, but lacks a published security policy or incident response contacts. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies and active consent mechanisms. Overall, the website and domain registration indicate a trustworthy and legitimate business with moderate user tracking and good technical implementation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching comply-app.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Comply operates in the technology sector offering compliance automation solutions primarily for GDPR and privacy regulations. Their SaaS business model targets compliance professionals and businesses needing to ensure website compliance efficiently. The company benefits from a consistent brand presence and a focused market niche. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for their compliance scanning and consent management services. The company uses LinkedIn for marketing and analytics, indicating a B2B focus. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The domain age and registration details align with the company's founding date, supporting credibility. The absence of phone contact may reflect a digital-first customer engagement approach. Strategic partnerships or related domains were not detected, suggesting a standalone operation or early-stage growth.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is good, with HTTPS enforced and several security headers implemented, including HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, and Content-Security-Policy. The domain is registered with clientTransferProhibited status, preventing unauthorized transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended improvement for DNS security. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is published, and no incident response contacts are provided, which are gaps in transparency and readiness. The site uses third-party tracking scripts such as LinkedIn Insight Tag and plausible.io, which are common but require proper privacy disclosures. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good but could be enhanced by publishing security policies and enabling DNSSEC.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Consider adding verified company phone contact information to improve customer trust and accessibility.
  5. Review and minimize third-party tracking scripts to enhance user privacy and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Comply
Description
Comply offers a platform to scan clients' websites for compliance, replacing manual checklists with automated controls.
Key services
Website compliance scanning, Automated privacy and cookie policy monitoring, Consent management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vue.js, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Azure DNS
Frameworks
Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client transfer prohibited domain status
  • No DNSSEC enabled (recommend enabling)
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
LinkedIn Analytics, Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
LinkedIn Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern JavaScript framework Vue.js
  2. Strong focus on GDPR and privacy compliance automation
  3. Includes cookie consent mechanism with user controls
  4. No exposed sensitive data or security issues detected
  5. Domain registration and hosting are stable and reputable
  6. No explicit contact phone numbers found, only email and contact form
  7. No published security policy or incident response contacts
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  9. Use of LinkedIn tracking and plausible analytics indicates moderate user tracking
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript framework Vue.js, indicating a contemporary front-end architecture. Hosting is managed via Azure DNS, a reputable cloud provider. The site includes multiple external scripts for analytics and consent management, including LinkedIn Insight Tag and plausible.io, reflecting a moderate level of user tracking and marketing sophistication. Performance is moderate, with preloading of scripts and fonts observed. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site generation approach. The technical stack is modern and well-implemented, though enabling DNSSEC and improving accessibility could further enhance the infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 63/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with comply-app.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review comply-app.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.