Skip to main content

Security report for comodule.com

Comodule · Transportation · Estonia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Comodule is a specialized IoT solutions provider focused on connectivity for e-bikes and light electric vehicles. Their offerings include flexible IoT solutions tailored for manufacturers, fleet operators, and software developers, positioning them as a leading player in the emissionless transport technology sector. The website reflects a professional digital presence with clear navigation and targeted content for their audience. Technically, the site is built on Squarespace with integration of multiple analytics and marketing tools, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain introduces some uncertainty regarding domain legitimacy, though the overall business presentation and related domains support credibility. Privacy compliance is partially addressed via cookie consent but lacks a visible privacy policy or terms of service. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing comprehensive privacy and security policies, and improving WHOIS transparency to strengthen trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 25 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching comodule.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Comodule operates in the intersection of transportation and technology sectors, focusing on IoT connectivity for e-bikes. Their business model targets B2B clients such as manufacturers and fleet operators, as well as developers through API and SDK offerings. The company leverages a professional website and multiple digital marketing tools to engage its audience. The presence of dedicated OEM and developer portals indicates a structured ecosystem supporting product integration and developer engagement. While the company appears medium-sized and established in Estonia, the lack of public company registration or contact details on the website suggests a need for improved transparency. The use of multiple tracking and advertising platforms reflects an active marketing strategy aimed at growth and customer acquisition.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs reCAPTCHA to protect forms, which are positive security measures. However, the absence of key security headers such as HSTS, Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no contact channels for security incidents are provided. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, as it limits verification of domain ownership and registration legitimacy. The site uses multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts, which may increase the attack surface if not properly managed. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing domain transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable and enforce HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) header to ensure HTTPS usage.
  2. Implement Content-Security-Policy (CSP) to mitigate cross-site scripting and related attacks.
  3. Add X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options headers to protect against clickjacking and MIME sniffing.
  4. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website footer.
  5. Improve WHOIS transparency by ensuring domain registration details are publicly available or verified.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Comodule
Description
Comodule is the world's leading IoT provider for e-bikes, offering flexible & comprehensive connectivity solutions that seamlessly integrate with various e-systems. They empower emissionless transport and aim to make the world cleaner and happier.
Key services
IoT solutions for manufacturers, IoT solutions for fleets, Software and API/SDK for developers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace CMS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Google Ads, Hotjar, Smartlook, Facebook Pixel, Iubenda Cookie Solution, reCAPTCHA
Platforms
Squarespace
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Smartlook, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Smartlook, ClearBit
Marketing tools
Iubenda Cookie Solution
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed using Squarespace CMS.
  2. Content is focused on IoT solutions for e-bikes and related services.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main site.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via Iubenda.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected.
  6. Multiple tracking and analytics scripts are used, indicating moderate user tracking.
  7. No advanced security headers detected; HTTPS is enforced.
  8. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Squarespace platform, leveraging its CMS capabilities for content management and responsive design. It integrates multiple third-party services including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Google Ads, Hotjar, Smartlook, Facebook Pixel, and Iubenda for cookie consent management. The site uses modern web fonts and asynchronous loading of scripts to optimize performance. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive layouts and accessible navigation. However, the site lacks advanced accessibility features and some SEO best practices could be enhanced. Performance is moderate, typical for CMS-based sites with multiple external scripts. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with comodule.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review comodule.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.