Skip to main content

Security report for communityagribusiness.org

Community Agribusiness Partners · Non-profit · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Community Agribusiness Partners is a US-based non-profit organization focused on transforming agriculture into sustainable businesses in Malawi, Rwanda, and Tanzania. Their approach involves collaboration with farming communities, governments, private sector, and NGOs to provide technical support, financial assistance, and training. The website is professionally designed on the Squarespace platform, featuring clear navigation and a donation widget powered by Fundraise Up. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and HSTS enabled, though some security headers are missing and privacy compliance is limited due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. No WHOIS data is available, likely due to privacy protection, which is common for non-profits. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional image but could improve privacy compliance and contact transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching communityagribusiness.org

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector targeting agribusiness development in East Africa. Their business model centers on partnerships and capacity building rather than commercial sales. The website content and structure indicate a small-sized entity with a focused mission. The presence of social media links and a donation platform suggests active engagement with donors and partners. Lack of detailed contact information and policies may limit trust for some stakeholders. The organization appears to maintain a niche position with potential for growth through partnerships and increased transparency.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS with HSTS enabled, indicating good baseline security. However, it lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The use of third-party scripts like Fundraise Up introduces some risk but is common for donation processing. Absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which could hinder response to security issues. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional headers and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Publish clear contact information including security incident response contacts to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities and update as needed.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Community Agribusiness Partners
Description
Community Agribusiness Partners collaborates with farming communities in Malawi, Rwanda, and Tanzania to transform agriculture into sustainable businesses, driving positive social and economic change. They partner with farmers, governments, private sector, and local NGOs providing resources and technical support including financial assistance and training programs.
Key services
Agribusiness partnership facilitation, Technical support and training, Financial assistance, Collaboration with governments and NGOs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace CMS, JavaScript, Fundraise Up widget, Google Fonts, Typekit Fonts
Platforms
Squarespace
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • HSTS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Fundraise Up
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed using Squarespace CMS
  2. Content is focused on non-profit agribusiness partnerships in East Africa
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on homepage
  4. No privacy or cookie policies detected
  5. No terms of service found
  6. Social media links to LinkedIn and Twitter present but generic URLs
  7. Fundraise Up widget used for donations
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  9. WHOIS data unavailable, likely privacy protected
  10. HTTPS and HSTS enabled, good SSL configuration
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Squarespace CMS, leveraging modern web technologies including JavaScript, Typekit fonts, and Google Fonts. It uses a third-party donation widget (Fundraise Up) loaded asynchronously. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, typical for CMS-based sites with external resources. No major technical debt or errors were detected in the HTML structure. Opportunities exist to improve SEO metadata completeness and accessibility compliance. Hosting is managed by Squarespace, providing reliable uptime and SSL support.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with communityagribusiness.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review communityagribusiness.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.