Skip to main content

Security report for commerce-connector.com

Wayvia · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Wayvia is a technology company specializing in commerce connector tools, providing B2B SaaS solutions for e-commerce integration and analytics. The website serves as a login portal for users, reflecting a rebranding from PriceSpider. The site is professionally designed with consistent branding and clear navigation, targeting business users in the e-commerce sector. Technically, the site employs modern frontend frameworks including jQuery, Foundation, Bootstrap, and the YII PHP framework, indicating a mature technology stack. Performance and mobile optimization are good, though accessibility could be improved. Security features include CSRF protection and secure form handling, but lack of HTTP security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain reduces trust slightly, though the site content and branding suggest legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could enhance privacy compliance and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: ms54893752.msv1.invalid

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching commerce-connector.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Wayvia operates in the technology and e-commerce sectors, focusing on commerce connector tools that facilitate integration and analytics for online retailers and brands. The rebranding from PriceSpider suggests an established market presence with a refreshed identity. The business model is B2B SaaS, targeting e-commerce professionals and businesses seeking enhanced commerce data solutions. The website lacks direct contact information and detailed company data, which limits transparency. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the site content. The company appears medium-sized with a focus on technology-driven commerce solutions. The presence of privacy and legal policies indicates regulatory awareness, though cookie consent is missing. The site does not currently use active analytics or marketing tools, suggesting a conservative approach to user tracking.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with implementation of CSRF tokens and secure login form practices. However, the lack of visible HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a notable gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of incident response contact information and vulnerability disclosure policies reduces transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is partial, with privacy and legal policies present but no cookie consent mechanism. The site is served over HTTPS (implied by URL), but SSL configuration details are unknown. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a login portal but could be strengthened by adding security headers, cookie consent, and incident response details.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure contact information to improve transparency and security readiness.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users, including those with disabilities.
  5. Activate privacy-compliant analytics tools to gain insights into user behavior while maintaining user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Wayvia
Description
Wayvia (formerly PriceSpider) provides commerce connector tools, likely focused on e-commerce integration and analytics.
Key services
Commerce connector tools, E-commerce analytics, Brand monitoring
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Foundation CSS framework, Bootstrap, YII PHP Framework (inferred from YII_CSRF_TOKEN)
Frameworks
YII Framework, Foundation, Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • CSRF token implemented in login form
  • Password toggle visibility implemented
  • Login form disables submit button until fields filled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login portal for Wayvia Commerce Connector, formerly PriceSpider.
  2. No WHOIS data available for the subdomain, indicating it is likely a subdomain of a parent domain.
  3. Site uses modern frontend frameworks and has basic security features like CSRF tokens.
  4. Privacy and legal policies are present but cookie consent is missing.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the login page.
  6. No analytics scripts currently active; Google Analytics is commented out.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of jQuery, Foundation CSS framework, Bootstrap, and the YII PHP framework, indicating a modern and modular frontend and backend architecture. The login form includes CSRF protection tokens, demonstrating attention to security in form handling. The site is mobile responsive with good design quality and user experience. However, the absence of active analytics scripts and cookie consent mechanisms suggests incomplete privacy implementation. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but also no advanced optimization detected. The site lacks visible HTTP security headers, which is a technical risk. Hosting provider and CMS are not identifiable from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 74/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with commerce-connector.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review commerce-connector.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.