Skip to main content

Security report for colibriwp.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ColibriWP is a technology company specializing in a drag and drop WordPress page builder tool aimed at simplifying website creation for WordPress users, web designers, and small to medium businesses. The website presents a professional design with good content quality and clear navigation, targeting users seeking an intuitive website building experience. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and integrations with Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services. The site uses multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Matomo, Facebook Pixel, and Google Tag Manager, indicating a mature digital marketing approach. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and bot protection via reCAPTCHA; however, it lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which are recommended for enhanced protection. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies, which could pose regulatory risks. Overall, the domain registration is consistent and legitimate, supporting the business credibility. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security hardening are advised to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching colibriwp.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ColibriWP operates in the competitive WordPress page builder market, offering a SaaS product that targets WordPress users and web designers seeking easy-to-use drag and drop tools. The business model focuses on software sales and subscriptions. The company appears to be a small-sized entity founded in 2018, with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. The website's marketing ecosystem includes partnerships with payment processors like 2Checkout, indicating established e-commerce capabilities. The lack of explicit contact information and privacy policies suggests areas for operational maturity improvement. The company maintains consistent branding and a professional online presence, positioning itself as a credible player in the WordPress technology sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. However, the absence of DNSSEC and lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection reduce the overall security robustness. No incident response or security policy documentation is publicly available, which may impact preparedness for security events. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. There are no indications of exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities in the provided content. Enhancing security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing security policies would significantly improve the security maturity and compliance posture.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Add clear and accessible contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  5. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response plan to demonstrate security governance and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
ColibriWP offers a drag and drop WordPress page builder tool designed to simplify website creation.
Key services
WordPress page builder tool, Drag and drop website design
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, Cloudflare, Google Analytics, Matomo, Facebook Pixel, Twitter UWT, Quora QEvents, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for bot protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Twitter Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Matomo, Quora QEvents
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional WordPress page builder product site.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in provided content.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the content.
  4. Multiple marketing and analytics scripts are used, indicating active user tracking.
  5. Security practices are basic with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA but lack advanced headers and DNSSEC.
  6. No evidence of security or incident response policies published.
  7. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  8. Domain WHOIS data is consistent and indicates legitimate registration.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including JavaScript libraries and integrations with Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services. It uses multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Matomo, Facebook Pixel, Twitter UWT, Quora QEvents, and Google Tag Manager, indicating a sophisticated marketing infrastructure. The site appears to be mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple external scripts and assets. There is no evidence of technical debt or deprecated technologies in the provided content. Opportunities exist to improve security configurations and privacy compliance to reduce technical risks and enhance user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with colibriwp.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review colibriwp.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.