Skip to main content

Security report for coffeefactory.lv

SIA COFFEE FACTORY · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA COFFEE FACTORY operates a retail website focused on selling coffee products, coffee machines, and water equipment primarily targeting consumers in Latvia. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact information and product offerings. The business appears to be a small local retailer with an online presence built on the Webnode platform and hosted via Cloudfront CDN. The site uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for visitor tracking and marketing purposes. From a technical perspective, the website employs modern web technologies and is mobile optimized with moderate performance. However, the site lacks some advanced security headers and does not provide visible privacy policy or terms of service pages, which are important for compliance and user trust. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented with options for users to accept necessary or all cookies, indicating some level of privacy awareness. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain legitimacy verification, but the website content and business information are consistent with a legitimate small business. There are no indications of adult or explicit content, making the site safe for general audiences. Overall, the website scores moderately well in content quality, technical implementation, security, privacy compliance, and business credibility. Strategic improvements in privacy documentation, security headers, and vulnerability disclosure would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching coffeefactory.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a niche retailer specializing in coffee and related equipment, serving a Latvian market segment interested in quality coffee products. The business model is direct retail with an online storefront, leveraging Webnode's CMS capabilities. The presence of contact email and phone number supports customer engagement and sales inquiries. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager suggests an intent to monitor and optimize marketing efforts. The company does not display certifications or extensive trust signals but maintains a consistent brand presence. Growth opportunities may include expanding product lines, improving compliance documentation, and enhancing digital marketing strategies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the site lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, which could mitigate risks like cross-site scripting and protocol downgrade attacks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, limiting transparency for security researchers. The cookie consent banner indicates some GDPR awareness but the absence of a privacy policy page reduces compliance confidence. No incident response or security contact information is provided. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy page clearly accessible from the homepage.
  2. Add terms of service and security policy pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  3. Enhance HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  5. Improve accessibility features and SEO optimization to enhance user experience and search visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA COFFEE FACTORY
Description
GARDA KAFIJA un cita produkcija (Delicious coffee and other products)
Key services
Coffee products, Coffee machines, Water equipment
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cloudfront CDN, Webnode platform
Platforms
Webnode
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Cookie consent banner present with advanced settings.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  5. Contact information includes a company email and phone number.
  6. Website built on Webnode platform with Cloudfront CDN.
  7. Uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  9. No certifications or security policies visible.
  10. Content is focused on coffee products and related equipment.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webnode platform, utilizing Cloudfront CDN for content delivery, which supports good availability and moderate performance. The tech stack includes standard JavaScript libraries and Google services for analytics and tag management. The site is mobile responsive and uses modern CSS and HTML practices, though some CSS files are conditionally disabled which may affect rendering on certain devices. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading speed and accessibility compliance. The lack of advanced SEO metadata and structured data limits search engine visibility potential.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with coffeefactory.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review coffeefactory.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.