Skip to main content

Security report for codognotto.eu

Gruppo Codognotto · Transportation · Italy

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gruppo Codognotto is a well-established logistics and freight transport company based in Italy, offering integrated logistics services including sea, air, and road transport, customs handling, and warehousing. The company operates a large fleet across multiple countries and holds recognized ISO certifications, positioning itself as a reliable third-party logistics provider in the European and international markets. The website reflects a professional business presence with clear service offerings and relevant content for its target audience. Technically, the site runs on Drupal 7 with common web technologies like jQuery and Bootstrap, but suffers from outdated CMS usage and lacks a valid SSL certificate, which significantly impacts its security posture. Security headers are partially implemented, but the absence of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols exposes users to risks. Privacy and cookie policies exist but are basic, with limited GDPR compliance indicators. Contact information is available via email and forms, but no phone numbers or physical addresses are explicitly provided. Overall, the website demonstrates moderate digital maturity but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching codognotto.eu

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
40
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets businesses needing comprehensive logistics and freight transport solutions, leveraging a large vehicle fleet and international operations. Its business model focuses on third-party logistics with value-added services such as customs clearance and packaging. The presence of ISO certifications and a structured website with news and job postings indicates a mature organization with growth and partnership initiatives. The partnership with multiways.com suggests collaboration with specialized service providers. However, the use of an outdated CMS and lack of advanced security measures may pose operational risks. The company’s marketing includes Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for tracking, indicating an interest in digital marketing and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website’s security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS support, which is critical for protecting data in transit. While some security headers like X-Content-Type-Options and X-Frame-Options are present, the lack of TLS protocols, HSTS, OCSP stapling, and session resumption reduces overall security effectiveness. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are found, limiting transparency and preparedness for security events. The use of Drupal 7, an older CMS version, increases the risk of vulnerabilities if not properly maintained. The site includes tracking scripts that may raise privacy concerns without strong compliance measures. Immediate remediation is recommended to secure communications and update platform components.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Upgrade Drupal CMS to a supported and secure version or apply all security patches promptly.
  3. Implement HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload directives to enforce secure connections.
  4. Add a security.txt file and clearly publish incident response contact information.
  5. Enhance privacy and cookie policies to explicitly address GDPR compliance and user consent.
  6. Review and minimize tracking scripts to balance marketing needs with user privacy.
  7. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility to enhance user experience.
  8. Regularly audit and update all third-party libraries and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 7 with jQuery 1.10.2 and Bootstrap for frontend styling. It uses Apache as the web server and is hosted by Aruba S.p.A. Performance metrics are not available, but the site shows signs of slow loading and basic mobile optimization. The HTML content is valid and structured with meta tags for SEO, but lacks modern enhancements like JSON-LD structured data or Open Graph tags. The presence of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel indicates integration with marketing and analytics tools. The absence of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols is a critical technical deficiency. The site uses multiple CSS imports and JavaScript libraries, some loaded from HTTP URLs, which may cause mixed content issues. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but outdated and requires modernization to improve security, performance, and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with codognotto.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review codognotto.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.