Skip to main content

Security report for cocemfe.es

COCEMFE · Non-profit · Spain

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

COCEMFE is a well-established Spanish non-profit organization founded in 1980, dedicated to the inclusion and active participation of people with physical and organic disabilities. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content covering employment, training, accessibility, education, legal advisory, accessible tourism, volunteering, and international cooperation. The organization maintains a strong market position nationally, representing millions of people and hundreds of associations. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and demonstrates good mobile optimization and accessibility features. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security headers and detailed privacy policies could be enhanced. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the website's professional design, clear contact information, and public funding references support its legitimacy. Overall, COCEMFE's digital presence is professional, trustworthy, and aligned with its mission.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cocemfe.es

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

COCEMFE operates as a key national confederation in Spain for disability advocacy, leveraging a network of over 1600 associations and 94 entities. Its business model is non-profit, focusing on social inclusion, legal defense, and support services. The organization benefits from public and private funding, including European Union programs and Spanish government ministries. Its target audience includes people with disabilities, families, institutions, and companies interested in social responsibility. The website's content and partnerships indicate a strong ecosystem and strategic collaborations. Growth indicators include digital tools like the COCEMFE App and virtual assistants, enhancing engagement and service delivery.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and GDPR-compliant cookie consent, indicating a baseline security and privacy awareness. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options suggests room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site does not publish a dedicated security policy or incident response information, which could enhance trust and preparedness. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened with additional technical controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish clear and accessible privacy and security policies, including data protection officer contact details.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Develop and communicate an incident response plan and contact channels for security issues.
  5. Enhance transparency around data retention and user privacy to improve GDPR compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
COCEMFE
Description
COCEMFE es una ONG sin ánimo de lucro constituida en 1980. Su objetivo es conseguir la plena inclusión y participación activa de las personas con discapacidad física y orgánica en todos los ámbitos de la sociedad.
Key services
Employment services, Training platform, Accessibility advocacy, Inclusive education, Legal advisory, Accessible tourism, Volunteering, Cooperation projects
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, AddToAny social sharing, WebToffee GDPR Cookie Consent
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of GDPR cookie consent plugin

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
AddToAny social sharing
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed non-profit organization site focused on disability inclusion in Spain.
  2. Content is rich, well-structured, and includes multiple service areas and news updates.
  3. Strong presence of social media and official partnerships with government and private entities.
  4. No WHOIS data available due to query restrictions, limiting domain trust assessment.
  5. Security posture is good but could be improved with explicit security headers and published policies.
  6. Privacy and terms policies are not clearly found or linked, though cookie consent is implemented.
  7. No signs of adult or inappropriate content; content is safe for general audiences.
  8. Use of modern WordPress plugins and technologies with good mobile and accessibility features.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution, supported by Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics. It uses a GDPR cookie consent plugin and social sharing tools. The site is mobile responsive with good accessibility features, including an accessibility toolbar. Performance is moderate, with caching and minified CSS in use. The technical stack is modern but relies on third-party plugins that require maintenance to avoid security risks. Hosting provider details are not evident. Overall, the infrastructure supports the organization's digital needs effectively but should be monitored for plugin updates and security patches.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cocemfe.es. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cocemfe.es.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.