Skip to main content

Security report for cocacola.be

The Coca-Cola Company · Retail · Belgium

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Coca-Cola Belgium Luxembourg website serves as a regional portal for The Coca-Cola Company, a global leader in the beverage industry. The site provides product information, promotions, and brand engagement content tailored for the Dutch-speaking Belgian market. The company operates at an enterprise scale with a strong market position in retail beverages. Technically, the website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and OneTrust for privacy compliance. The site demonstrates excellent mobile optimization, fast performance, and good SEO practices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, comprehensive security headers, and active monitoring via AWS RUM. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR-aligned policies. However, WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which is unusual but does not detract significantly from the site's legitimacy given the strong branding and professional presentation. Overall, the website is a secure, compliant, and professionally managed digital asset supporting Coca-Cola's business in Belgium.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Potential Subdomain Takeover

      Subdomain dev.coca-cola.com points to unregistered service d35z9qgtdrqblz.cloudfront.net

      What to do: Remove or fix CNAME record to prevent subdomain takeover

      • WSTG-CONF-10
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cocacola.be

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention cocacola.be, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
331
Employees
0
Customers
331
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
12%

5 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for cocacola.be.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Coca-Cola Company maintains a strong market presence in the beverage sector, targeting general consumers with a focus on retail distribution. The website supports brand awareness and customer engagement through localized content and promotions. The business model is primarily B2C retail with extensive global reach. The company benefits from a consistent branding strategy and uses advanced digital marketing tools to track user engagement and optimize campaigns. Partnerships with major ad networks and analytics providers enhance marketing effectiveness. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the main site suggests a preference for controlled communication channels, likely via contact forms. The company’s digital ecosystem is mature, reflecting its enterprise status and global operational standards.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, including Content Security Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. The integration of AWS Real User Monitoring allows for proactive detection of security policy violations and performance issues. Cookie consent is managed via OneTrust, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of a public security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file is a gap that could be addressed to enhance trust and facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting. Overall, the site is secure but could improve in transparency and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information, such as a security@ or abuse@ email address.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance transparency around data retention policies related to analytics and tracking.
  5. Continue regular security audits and update third-party libraries to mitigate emerging vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
The Coca-Cola Company
Description
Ontdek de Coca-Cola België Luxemburg website voor verfrissende dranken, nieuws, promoties en meer. Verken onze producten en vind vandaag nog jouw favoriete Coke.
Key services
Beverage product information, Promotions, Brand engagement
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Experience Manager, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent, AWS RUM (Real User Monitoring), Helix RUM JS, GCDS (Global Coca-Cola Design System)
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy implemented
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Security policy violation reporting via RUM

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, AWS RUM
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Dutch for Belgium market.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie consent mechanisms are in place.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page; contact via form likely.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual but site appears legitimate.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  8. No explicit adult content; content is beverage-related targeting mature audience.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, a robust enterprise CMS platform, ensuring scalability and content management efficiency. The use of Google Tag Manager and OneTrust indicates a sophisticated approach to marketing and privacy compliance. Performance is optimized with asynchronous script loading and preloading of critical CSS. Mobile optimization is excellent, with responsive design and tailored splash screens for various Apple devices. Accessibility features are present but could be further enhanced with explicit ARIA roles and keyboard navigation improvements. SEO is well supported through meta tags and Open Graph data, although some Open Graph fields like image and URL are empty and could be completed for better social media integration. The absence of WHOIS data is a technical anomaly but does not impact site functionality. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern, performant, and aligned with enterprise standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cocacola.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cocacola.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.