Skip to main content

Security report for coca-colacompany.com

The Coca-Cola Company · Retail · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and DNS health.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Coca-Cola Company is a globally recognized beverage corporation with a rich history spanning over 138 years. The company operates in the retail sector, focusing on manufacturing and distributing a wide portfolio of beverage products worldwide. The website reflects the company's strong market position and brand presence, targeting a broad audience including consumers, investors, and job seekers. It provides comprehensive corporate information, sustainability initiatives, and media resources, reinforcing its leadership in the industry. Technically, the website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, leveraging modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager for analytics and OneTrust for cookie consent management. The site demonstrates good performance, excellent mobile optimization, and accessibility features, contributing to a positive user experience. SEO practices are well implemented with appropriate meta tags and structured content. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and includes essential security headers. The presence of a cookie consent mechanism indicates compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR. However, no explicit security policy or incident response information is publicly available, and the WHOIS data for the domain is missing, which is unusual for a major brand but does not detract from the site's legitimacy based on content and branding. Overall, the website presents a low risk profile with strong business credibility and technical maturity. Strategic recommendations include publishing detailed security and incident response policies, establishing a vulnerability disclosure program, and ensuring WHOIS data transparency to enhance trust further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: ns1.ko.com

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching coca-colacompany.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention coca-colacompany.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
251
Employees
0
Customers
182
Third parties
69
Weak passwords
33%

6 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for coca-colacompany.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Coca-Cola Company maintains a dominant market position in the global beverage industry, leveraging a diversified portfolio of brands and a well-established distribution network. Its business model centers on product innovation, brand management, and sustainability efforts. The company targets a wide demographic, including consumers across various regions, investors, and potential employees. Growth indicators include active media engagement and sustainability initiatives. The partnership ecosystem includes investor relations and media centers, supporting transparency and stakeholder engagement. The website's comprehensive corporate content and consistent branding reflect a mature and strategically focused organization.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, robust SSL configuration, and implementation of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. The cookie consent mechanism aligns with GDPR requirements, indicating attention to privacy compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure page suggests areas for improvement in transparency and readiness. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a minor concern but does not indicate immediate risk given the site's professional presentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response information on the website to enhance transparency.
  2. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Ensure WHOIS data is complete and publicly accessible to improve domain registration transparency.
  4. Regularly perform security audits and vulnerability scans to maintain a strong security posture.
  5. Enhance contact information availability, including direct company emails and phone numbers for support and security contacts.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
The Coca-Cola Company
Description
The Coca-Cola Company is a global beverage company with a portfolio of brands. It aims to refresh the world and make a difference, with over 138 years of history.
Key services
Beverage production, Brand management, Sustainability initiatives
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Experience Manager, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Slick Carousel
Frameworks
Adobe AEM
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong branding and consistent corporate messaging
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact likely via forms
  5. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure page found
  6. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual for a major corporate domain
  7. Use of Adobe Experience Manager CMS and Google Tag Manager for analytics
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content
  9. No WAF or blocking detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, a robust enterprise CMS platform, indicating a high level of technical infrastructure maturity. Integration with Google Tag Manager and OneTrust demonstrates modern analytics and privacy compliance capabilities. The site uses slick-carousel for UI components, enhancing user experience. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The technical implementation follows best practices with valid meta tags and structured content. Opportunities exist to improve hosting transparency and to optimize performance further by auditing third-party scripts and resources.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 77/100Low21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with coca-colacompany.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review coca-colacompany.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.