Skip to main content

Security report for coca-cola.ge

The Coca-Cola Company · Retail · Georgia

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in Security headers.

Security score

86/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents the Georgian localized Coca-Cola brand portal, showcasing campaigns and product information tailored for the Georgian market. It reflects a strong brand presence consistent with The Coca-Cola Company's global identity. The technical infrastructure is modern, leveraging Adobe Experience Manager CMS, Google Tag Manager, and OneTrust for cookie consent, indicating a mature digital setup. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and monitoring scripts, though explicit security headers and privacy policies are not evident in the provided data. Overall, the site is professional, mobile-optimized, and trustworthy, though improvements in privacy transparency and security headers are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching coca-cola.ge

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
86

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention coca-cola.ge, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for coca-cola.ge right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Coca-Cola is a global leader in the beverage retail sector, with a strong market position and extensive brand recognition. This localized site targets Georgian consumers, supporting brand marketing and engagement. The business model focuses on consumer goods distribution and brand promotion. The site integrates with global marketing and analytics tools, reflecting a sophisticated partnership ecosystem. The absence of direct contact information suggests a focus on brand experience rather than direct sales or support via this portal. The domain's WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which is typical for large enterprises.

Security posture

The site employs HTTPS and integrates real user monitoring and cookie consent mechanisms, demonstrating awareness of security and privacy best practices. However, the lack of visible security headers such as CSP, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options is a gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by adding explicit security headers and clear security contact information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to improve security posture.
  3. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents and data protection inquiries.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Improve SEO metadata completeness and structured data for better search visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
The Coca-Cola Company
Description
The website presents campaigns and news related to Coca-Cola and Fanta brands, including water "მთის" mystical powers, targeting Georgian audience.
Key services
Brand marketing, Product information, Campaign promotion
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Helix RUM, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent, AWS RUM Client, HTML5, CSS Variables, JavaScript
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Security policy violation reporting via RUM

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Adobe Helix RUM
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or protected, which is common for large brands.
  3. OneTrust cookie consent is implemented indicating GDPR awareness.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in provided content.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the analyzed content.
  6. Site uses Adobe Experience Manager CMS and modern web technologies.
  7. Google Tag Manager and Adobe RUM used for analytics and monitoring.
  8. No security headers explicitly detected in provided data; recommend adding.
  9. Site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design.
  10. No suspicious or malicious domains linked.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, using modern CSS variables and JavaScript libraries for performance and user experience. Google Tag Manager and Adobe Helix RUM are used for analytics and monitoring. The site is mobile responsive with good design quality. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and preloading of CSS. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were observed. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and SEO optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with coca-cola.ge. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review coca-cola.ge.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.