Skip to main content

Security report for coca-cola.com

The Coca-Cola Company · Retail · Finland

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and DNS health.

Security score

84/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Coca-Cola Company website for the Finnish market presents a professional and comprehensive digital presence focused on promoting its beverage products such as classic Coca-Cola, Coca-Cola Zero, and Coca-Cola Light. The site is well-branded, consistent, and targets a general consumer audience with clear product information and brand history. The technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies including Adobe Experience Manager, Google Tag Manager, AWS RUM, and OneTrust for privacy compliance, indicating a mature digital ecosystem. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and content security policies, although explicit security policy and incident response information are not publicly disclosed. Overall, the website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance with privacy regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Potential Subdomain Takeover

      Subdomain dev.coca-cola.com points to unregistered service d35z9qgtdrqblz.cloudfront.net

      What to do: Remove or fix CNAME record to prevent subdomain takeover

      • WSTG-CONF-10
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching coca-cola.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
84

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention coca-cola.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
77,600
Employees
71
Customers
62,461
Third parties
15,068
Weak passwords
6%

Latest record dated 2026-06-06 · 188 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for coca-cola.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –www.coca-cola.com2026-06-06
  • –us.coca-cola.com2026-06-05
  • –mail-4c.coca-cola.com2026-05-26
  • –mail-4c.coca-cola.com2026-05-25
  • –mail-3c.coca-cola.com2026-05-13

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Coca-Cola is a global leader in the beverage retail sector with a strong brand presence worldwide. The Finnish site is part of a large enterprise business model focused on B2C sales and brand engagement. The company benefits from a robust partnership ecosystem and uses advanced marketing and analytics tools to optimize user experience and compliance. The absence of direct contact information on the homepage suggests a focus on brand and product promotion rather than direct customer service via the website. The domain's WHOIS data is not publicly available, likely due to privacy or registry policies, but the brand's global reputation supports its legitimacy.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and integration of security monitoring via AWS RUM. Cookie consent is managed through OneTrust, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the lack of publicly available security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates areas for improvement in transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The security score is high but could be enhanced by publishing explicit security and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and frameworks.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance contact information availability for business and security inquiries.
  5. Continue monitoring and updating third-party libraries to avoid vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
The Coca-Cola Company
Description
Tutustu Coca-Colan virkistäviin juomiin, kuten klassiseen Coca-Colaan, Coca-Cola Zerohon ja Coca-Cola Lightiin. Lue lisää brändistä ja sen historiasta.
Key services
Beverage products, Brand information, Consumer engagement
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Helix RUM, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent, AWS RUM, GCDS SDK
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy present
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Security policy violation reporting via AWS RUM

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, AWS RUM
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Marketing tools
OneTrust
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and professionally designed
  2. Strong privacy and cookie consent mechanisms implemented
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage
  4. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to privacy or registry restrictions
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  6. No security or vulnerability disclosure information publicly available
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, a robust enterprise CMS, and uses modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and AWS RUM for performance and error monitoring. The site is optimized for mobile devices with responsive design and includes accessibility features. Performance is fast with preloading of critical CSS and asynchronous loading of scripts. The use of OneTrust for cookie consent demonstrates compliance with privacy regulations. Hosting appears to be managed internally or via AWS infrastructure. Overall, the technical implementation is modern, scalable, and well-maintained.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 86/100 +7Low19 findingsView report
  2. 79/100Low17 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with coca-cola.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review coca-cola.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.