Skip to main content

Security report for clipr.co

Clipr · Technology · France

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Clipr is a technology company specializing in delivering immersive social experiences for brands and publishers. Their platform integrates social stories, carousels, and posts directly into websites to enhance user engagement and revenue. The company targets top-tier brands and publishers globally, positioning itself as a B2B SaaS provider in the social media technology space. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear messaging and trusted client logos. Technically, the site is built on Webflow with modern analytics and tracking tools, offering good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and secure forms, though lacking advanced security headers and explicit policies. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a privacy policy and terms of service but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is credible and trustworthy with room for improvement in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching clipr.co

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
72
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Clipr operates in the technology and media sectors, providing social content integration services primarily to publishers and advertisers. Their business model focuses on SaaS offerings that enable clients to embed social storytelling formats on their websites. The presence of high-profile clients like L'Oreal, Audi, and Adidas indicates strong market positioning and brand trust. The company leverages partnerships and a modern tech stack to deliver its services efficiently. Growth potential is supported by the increasing demand for social media engagement tools. However, the absence of detailed business registration data and physical contact information limits full transparency. The company appears to be a small-sized entity based in France, with a focus on innovation in social media technology.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and forms require essential fields like email, indicating basic data protection. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could hinder rapid response to security events. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism may pose GDPR compliance risks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small technology company but would benefit from enhanced policies and technical controls to strengthen trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to ensure full GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trust and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to avoid vulnerabilities and ensure secure integrations.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide more detailed business contact information to improve user trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Clipr
Description
Clipr provides immersive social experiences designed to improve engagement and revenue for top brands and publishers by integrating social stories, carousels, and posts into websites.
Key services
In Feed Stories, Stories Carousel, Social Post integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, jQuery 3.5.1, Webflow CMS, Google Fonts, Embedly
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure form submission with required email fields

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners detected.
  3. Contact form collects personal data with required email and title fields.
  4. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly listed.
  5. Social media links present but URLs are placeholders (#).
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  8. Trusted client logos enhance credibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS and hosted on Webflow's CDN, leveraging modern web technologies such as jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Embedly for media embedding. The site uses Google Fonts for typography and is optimized for mobile devices with responsive design. Performance is moderate, with video and image assets loaded efficiently. The HTML structure is valid and SEO-friendly with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. However, accessibility is basic and could be improved with ARIA attributes and better keyboard navigation support. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained but lacks advanced security configurations and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with clipr.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review clipr.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.