Skip to main content

Security report for clip-group.com

CLIP Group S.A. · Transportation · Poland

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CLIP Group S.A. is a well-established logistics company based in Poland, specializing in intermodal container terminal operations, storage, and transport services including rail and road. The company holds a strong market position as a leading operator in intermodal transport within Europe, supported by certifications and active participation in EU projects. Their website reflects a professional and comprehensive digital presence with clear service offerings and active communication channels. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and frameworks, offering good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, though improvements in security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms are recommended. Overall, the business demonstrates high credibility and operational maturity with room for enhancing privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching clip-group.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets B2B clients requiring logistics and intermodal transport solutions, leveraging partnerships with entities like STS Logistic and Mercedes Benz. Their business model focuses on contract logistics, terminal operations, and multimodal transport services. Market positioning is strong, evidenced by rankings and certifications. The website content and linked domains indicate a robust partnership ecosystem and active engagement in EU-funded projects, signaling growth and compliance with regional standards. Revenue streams likely derive from logistics services, terminal usage fees, and transport contracts. The company maintains a consistent brand and professional content, supporting trust and market reputation.

Security posture

CLIP Group's website employs HTTPS and domain transfer protections, indicating baseline security awareness. However, the absence of a cookie consent mechanism and security.txt file reveals gaps in GDPR compliance and vulnerability disclosure readiness. Security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options are missing, which could expose the site to certain attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Incident response contact information is not publicly available, limiting transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate with clear opportunities for improvement to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive cookie consent banner to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Publish a security.txt file detailing vulnerability disclosure and incident response contacts.
  3. Enhance HTTP security headers by adding Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear incident response and security contact information on the website.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CLIP Group S.A.
Description
CLIP Group is a logistics group operating in storage, transport, and related services including intermodal container terminal operations, rail and road transport.
Key services
Magazynowanie (Storage and contract logistics), Terminal Intermodalny (Intermodal Container Terminal), Transport Kolejowy (Rail Transport), Transport Drogowy (Road Transport)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, PHP, Smart Slider 3, Ultimate Floating Widgets, FontAwesome, jQuery, Hotjar
Frameworks
Avada Theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar, 365insightcreative
Marketing tools
Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional, well-structured, and business-focused on logistics and transport.
  3. Strong presence of social media and EU project participation indicates active business engagement.
  4. No explicit cookie consent mechanism found, which is a GDPR compliance gap.
  5. Security headers could be improved for enhanced protection.
  6. No visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information.
  7. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and consistency with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress 6.8.3 using the Avada theme and plugins like Smart Slider 3 and Ultimate Floating Widgets. It uses jQuery and FontAwesome for UI elements and integrates Hotjar for user behavior analytics. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, with some room for optimization. Hosting details are not explicit, but domain name servers relate to a partner logistics company. The technical stack is modern and suitable for the business needs, though security header enhancements and privacy compliance mechanisms are advised to reduce risk and improve user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with clip-group.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review clip-group.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.