Skip to main content

Security report for clintonglobal.org

Clinton Foundation · Non-profit · United States

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Clinton Foundation's Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) is a well-established non-profit organization focused on addressing global challenges through convening leaders from various sectors to collaborate and commit to actionable solutions. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, consistent branding, and rich content including multimedia and event information. The technical infrastructure leverages WordPress CMS with modern analytics and marketing tools, ensuring good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and monitoring tools, though explicit privacy policies and contact information for security incidents are lacking. Overall, the site demonstrates high trustworthiness and professionalism suitable for a global non-profit entity.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching clintonglobal.org

This scan found 15 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
Average
76
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CGI operates as a catalyst for change in international development, targeting a diverse audience including government officials, business leaders, and civil society. Its business model centers on facilitating partnerships and commitments to action, supported by annual meetings and ongoing programs. The organization maintains a strong market position as a reputable non-profit with extensive partnerships and a global reach. The website's content and linked partner domains reinforce its role in philanthropy and global development. The absence of direct contact details and privacy policies suggests areas for improvement in transparency and compliance.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates security monitoring tools such as New Relic, indicating a proactive security approach. However, the lack of visible security headers and absence of a published privacy policy or terms of service represent compliance gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site would benefit from publishing clear security policies, incident response contacts, and a vulnerability disclosure mechanism to enhance its security maturity and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents, including security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking pixels to minimize security risks and ensure privacy compliance.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Registration number
Chamber of Commerce
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Clinton Foundation
Description
CGI is more than a conference — it’s a catalyst for change. Since 2005, we’ve helped set the annual international development agenda and have proven that the biggest global challenges can be solved through community, collaboration, and a commitment to action.
Key services
Annual meetings and convenings, Facilitation of Commitments to Action, Partnership development, Technical support for scaling solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress CMS, jQuery, YouTube iframe API, Google Tag Manager, TikTok Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Fundraise Up widget, Sleeknote, CookieYes cookie consent
Frameworks
Yoast SEO, New Relic Browser monitoring
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Use of cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security monitoring scripts (New Relic)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), TikTok Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Analytics, PostHog
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
TikTok Pixel, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, PostHog
Marketing tools
Fundraise Up, Sleeknote, EveryAction
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. No WHOIS data available due to malformed WHOIS response
  3. Strong branding and consistent design
  4. Multiple social media channels linked
  5. Use of modern tracking and analytics tools
  6. Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  7. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the analyzed page
  8. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the page
  9. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing a range of modern JavaScript libraries and third-party services for analytics, marketing, and fundraising. The presence of Google Tag Manager, TikTok Pixel, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, and Fundraise Up indicates a sophisticated marketing and data collection setup. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing multimedia content and third-party script loading. The technical stack is well-maintained but would benefit from enhanced security header configurations and clearer privacy compliance mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with clintonglobal.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review clintonglobal.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.