Skip to main content

Security report for climate-chance.org

Climate Chance · Non-profit · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Climate Chance operates a WordPress-based website primarily serving as a login portal for its members or contributors involved in climate initiatives. The site is focused on providing access to resources and information related to climate change advocacy. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress with common libraries such as jQuery and password strength meter scripts, indicating a standard CMS deployment with moderate digital maturity. Security posture is basic with HTTPS usage and password strength enforcement but lacks visible advanced security headers or multi-factor authentication. Privacy and compliance policies are not present on this login page, which reduces overall privacy compliance confidence. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable due to query failure or privacy protection, which is common for non-profit organizations seeking to protect registrant information. Overall, the website is safe, functional, and moderately trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching climate-chance.org

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
40
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention climate-chance.org, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
5
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
5
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for climate-chance.org.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Climate Chance appears to be a niche non-profit organization focused on climate change initiatives, serving a specialized audience of stakeholders and members. The business model likely revolves around advocacy, information dissemination, and member engagement. The website's limited public content and login focus suggest a controlled access model. There is no evidence of commercial activities or monetization on the login page. The organization maintains a moderate market position within the climate advocacy sector. Lack of visible contact information or certifications limits external trust signals. The partnership ecosystem and growth indicators cannot be assessed from the login page alone.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enforced on the login form and a password strength meter implemented to encourage strong passwords. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No multi-factor authentication or advanced login protections are evident. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for non-profits but limits transparency. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The site would benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance documentation to improve its security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Add multi-factor authentication to the login process to enhance account security.
  3. Publish privacy and cookie policies clearly accessible from all pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Provide visible contact information and security incident response contacts to enhance transparency.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Climate Chance
Description
Climate Chance is an organization focused on climate-related initiatives. The website is a WordPress-based platform primarily serving as a login portal for users, indicating a membership or contributor-based model.
Key services
Climate change information dissemination, Member login and access to resources
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, dashicons, underscore.js, zxcvbn password strength meter
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Password strength meter implemented
  • Login form uses HTTPS action URL

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress login page for Climate Chance organization.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query failure or privacy protection.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected on this page.
  4. No contact information or social media links found in the login page HTML.
  5. Security features like password strength meter are implemented.
  6. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  7. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
  8. Limited content on this page as it is a login portal.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS version 6.8.3 with standard libraries such as jQuery 3.7.1, underscore.js, and the zxcvbn password strength meter. The login page includes CSS and JS assets loaded from the same domain, indicating self-hosted resources. The site uses UTF-8 charset and French language locale. The page is mobile responsive to a basic degree and includes accessibility features such as ARIA roles and screen reader text. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. No advanced frameworks or hosting provider information is discernible from the HTML content. The site lacks SEO meta tags beyond basic robots directives and no structured data (JSON-LD) or Open Graph tags were found on this login page.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with climate-chance.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review climate-chance.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.