Skip to main content

Security report for clicktravel.com

Perk · Transportation · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Perk operates a specialist platform branded as 'Click Travel, Powered by Perk', targeting UK-based companies and the public sector to facilitate business travel booking, management, and reporting. The website presents a professional and modern digital presence, leveraging technologies such as Astro framework, Storyblok CMS, and various analytics and marketing tools including Google Tag Manager, Datadog RUM, and Usercentrics for consent management. Despite the professional front-end and user experience, the absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain www.perk.com raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. The website is secured with HTTPS and employs consent mechanisms, but lacks visible privacy policies, terms of service, and direct contact information, which are critical for compliance and user trust. Overall, the platform appears functional and targeted, but verification of domain registration and enhanced transparency in privacy and contact details are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  4. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching clicktravel.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
45
Email security
77
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Perk positions itself as a key player in the UK business travel sector, offering a unified platform for travel management tailored to corporate and public sector clients. The business model revolves around SaaS platform services, focusing on streamlining travel bookings and reporting. The website's content and branding are consistent and professionally presented, indicating a medium-sized enterprise with a clear market niche. The use of advanced web technologies and third-party integrations suggests a mature digital infrastructure. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS data and absence of explicit business contact details limit full confidence in business credibility. Strategic partnerships or subsidiary domains were not identified in the provided data.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and integrates a consent management platform, reflecting adherence to basic security and privacy standards. The use of modern analytics and monitoring tools indicates active performance and user behavior tracking. However, the absence of explicit security headers and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts represent gaps in security best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing comprehensive security headers, publishing security policies, and providing clear channels for incident reporting.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance transparency and compliance.
  2. Add explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide clear and accessible contact information including company emails and phone numbers for support and security incident reporting.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration details to ensure domain legitimacy and build trust with users.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and user data handling practices.

Contact details published on the site

Registration number
Registration number C
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Perk
Description
Click Travel, Powered by Perk, offers one specialist platform for UK-based companies and the public sector to book, manage and report on all of your business travel.
Key services
Business travel booking, Travel management, Travel reporting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Usercentrics CMP, Datadog RUM, AB Tasty, Intercom Widget
Frameworks
Astro
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management platform used

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Datadog RUM, Segment
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Segment, AB Tasty, Intercom
Marketing tools
Usercentrics CMP, Intercom
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  2. No WHOIS data available for domain www.perk.com; domain may be unregistered or privacy protected.
  3. No explicit privacy policy, terms of service, or contact information found in provided HTML content.
  4. Consent management platform (Usercentrics) is implemented indicating some privacy compliance effort.
  5. Website uses modern technologies and third-party services for analytics and user engagement.
  6. No forms detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  7. No company contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided content.
  8. No social media links explicitly found in the provided content.
  9. Website targets UK-based companies and public sector for business travel management.
  10. Content is professional and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Astro framework and utilizes Storyblok as its CMS, hosted on Amazon CloudFront CDN. It integrates multiple third-party services including Google Tag Manager, Datadog RUM for real user monitoring, AB Tasty for A/B testing, Intercom for customer engagement, and Usercentrics for consent management. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple external scripts. No forms were detected in the analyzed content, indicating limited direct data collection on this page. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-structured but could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with clicktravel.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review clicktravel.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.