Skip to main content

Security report for cleancontrol.lv

Clean Control · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Clean Control is a leading dry cleaning and laundry service provider operating primarily in Latvia and the Baltic region. The company offers a wide range of services including chemical dry cleaning, laundry, cleaning of leather and fur products, carpets, shoes, bags, helmets, child car seats, painting clothes, and repair services. They operate multiple physical reception points and automated kiosks called Tīromāts, enhancing customer convenience. The website is multilingual, supporting English, Latvian, and Russian, targeting a broad audience in the Baltic states. Mobile applications are available for both iOS and Android platforms, indicating a focus on digital engagement. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bootstrap and Leaflet.js for interactive maps. It uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking and marketing purposes. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Cookie compliance is implemented via a GDPR plugin, though no explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were detected in the provided content. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses some security best practices, but lacks explicit security headers and visible incident response or security policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy and registration details. Overall, Clean Control's website presents a professional and trustworthy front for its dry cleaning services with good digital maturity. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy documentation, and WHOIS transparency would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cleancontrol.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
95
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Clean Control holds a strong market position as a leading dry cleaning network in the Baltic states, leveraging both physical locations and automated kiosks to serve customers. Their business model focuses on convenience and comprehensive textile care services, targeting individual consumers and possibly businesses requiring textile maintenance. The presence of mobile apps suggests an investment in customer engagement and digital service delivery. The company appears medium-sized with multiple locations primarily in Latvia. The multilingual website supports regional market penetration. Partnerships or subsidiaries were not identified from the data. The company uses modern web technologies and marketing tools, indicating a commitment to digital growth and customer analytics.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of GDPR cookie compliance mechanisms. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which may impact transparency and readiness perception. No vulnerabilities or sensitive data exposure were found in the HTML content. The site uses common third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Tag Manager, which require careful privacy management. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a service website but could be improved with enhanced headers, documented policies, and regular security audits.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages clearly accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  3. Enhance incident response readiness by providing contact channels for security incidents or abuse reports.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain compatibility.
  5. Conduct accessibility audits and improve features to meet WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Clean Control
Description
Clean Control is a leading chemical dry cleaning network with extensive experience in successful private orders across the Baltic states.
Key services
Dry cleaning of clothes and textiles, Laundry, Cleaning of leather and fur products, Cleaning of carpets, shoes, bags, helmets, child car seats, Painting clothes, Clothing and shoe repair, Key making
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Bootstrap 5.1.0, jQuery 3.7.1, Leaflet.js 1.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, qTranslate-XT (multilingual plugin), Moove GDPR Cookie Compliance plugin
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of GDPR cookie compliance plugin

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a multilingual WordPress site with English, Latvian, and Russian versions.
  2. The site offers detailed location information with interactive maps for physical dry cleaning points and automated kiosks.
  3. Mobile apps are promoted with direct links to Apple App Store and Google Play.
  4. Cookie compliance is implemented with a visible consent mechanism.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were found in the provided content.
  6. Contact information includes multiple phone numbers and physical addresses for locations.
  7. No security or incident response policies are publicly visible.
  8. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with Bootstrap 5.1.0 for responsive design and Leaflet.js for interactive mapping of service locations. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site supports three languages via qTranslate-XT plugin, enhancing regional accessibility. The presence of a GDPR cookie compliance plugin indicates attention to privacy regulations. Performance is moderate with modern CDN usage for fonts and scripts. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive images and navigation. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The site lacks visible advanced SEO structured data like JSON-LD. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical stack is modern and suitable for a service-oriented business website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cleancontrol.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cleancontrol.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.