Skip to main content

Security report for civic-forum.eu

European Civic Forum · Non-profit · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The European Civic Forum (ECF) is a well-established pan-European non-profit network comprising nearly 100 associations and NGOs across 29 countries. Founded in 2005, ECF focuses on protecting civic space, enabling civic participation, and fostering civil dialogue to promote equality, solidarity, and democracy in Europe. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with comprehensive content about their advocacy, network, and monitoring activities. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and several plugins, with good SEO and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent, though lacking some security headers and explicit security policies. Contact is primarily via forms, with no direct emails or phone numbers publicly listed. Overall, the site is credible and trustworthy, serving a specialized audience of civil society actors.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching civic-forum.eu

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
70
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention civic-forum.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for civic-forum.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ECF holds a strong market position as a key NGO network in Europe, leveraging partnerships such as Civic Space Watch. Their business model centers on advocacy, capacity building, and monitoring civic space, targeting NGOs and activists. The organization benefits from a broad membership base and a clear mission, supported by structured content and active social media channels. Revenue streams likely include grants and funding from partners, though not explicitly detailed. The website supports growth and engagement through newsletters and events, indicating a mature digital presence.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating baseline security awareness. However, the absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts suggest room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The site does not provide a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file, which could enhance transparency and trust. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be strengthened to meet higher compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve privacy compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information, including a security or abuse email address.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide direct contact emails or phone numbers for better user support and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
European Civic Forum
Description
The European Civic Forum (ECF) is a pan-European network of nearly 100 associations and NGOs across 29 European countries. Founded in 2005 by member organisations, it works to protect civic space, enable civic participation, and build civil dialogue for equality, solidarity, and democracy in Europe.
Key services
Policy & Advocacy, Network & Capacity Building, Monitoring & Reporting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Divi Theme 4.27.4, jQuery, Supreme Modules for Divi, Popups for Divi, The Post Grid plugin, Google Site Kit, CookieYes cookie consent
Frameworks
WordPress, Divi Builder
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookieYes, Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional non-profit NGO network site focused on European civic society.
  2. Content is rich with advocacy, reports, campaigns, and member information.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via CookieYes.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via forms and contact page.
  6. Good SEO and structured data usage with JSON-LD and Open Graph tags.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site fully accessible.
  10. Social media presence is strong with official Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, and LinkedIn links.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with the Divi theme and several specialized plugins for popups, grids, and analytics integration. It uses Google Fonts and Google Analytics for performance and tracking. The site is mobile optimized and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement. Performance is moderate, with some potential for optimization in loading speed and accessibility. Hosting details are limited to registrar information, with no explicit hosting provider identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the organization's digital needs effectively but could benefit from enhanced security and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with civic-forum.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review civic-forum.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.