Skip to main content

Security report for civi-kune-rlp.de

Flüchtlingsrat RLP e.V. · Non-profit · Germany

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

civi kune RLP is a non-profit project operated by Flüchtlingsrat RLP e.V., focusing on refugee support, community engagement, and volunteer coordination in the German state of Rheinland-Pfalz. The website serves as an informational hub providing news, event updates, and resources for volunteers and refugees. It maintains a consistent brand identity aligned with its parent organization and regional government partners. Technically, the site is built on WordPress, leveraging standard web technologies and hosted by Manitu GmbH. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though it lacks some advanced security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is partially met with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained, serving its community-focused mission effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: Telnet

      Port 23 (Telnet) is publicly accessible - Telnet - Unencrypted remote access

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to Telnet using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching civi-kune-rlp.de

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
28
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The project operates within the non-profit sector, targeting volunteers and refugees in Rheinland-Pfalz. It leverages partnerships with regional government bodies and the Flüchtlingsrat RLP e.V. organization. The business model is informational and community service-oriented without commercial transactions. The site demonstrates good content quality and regular updates, indicating active engagement. Its market position is regional and niche, focusing on refugee aid and solidarity. The absence of commercial advertising or tracking tools aligns with its non-profit nature. The partnership with the Ministry for Family, Women, Culture, and Integration enhances credibility and funding support.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. It uses updated WordPress core and plugins, including Contact Form 7, with caching mechanisms. However, it lacks implementation of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy is published, which is a gap in transparency and preparedness. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present. Overall, the site is secure for its purpose but could benefit from enhanced security controls and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to strengthen web security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply fully with GDPR cookie regulations.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding terms of service to clarify user rights and responsibilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Flüchtlingsrat RLP e.V.
Description
civi kune RLP is a project of Flüchtlingsrat RLP e.V. focused on refugee support, encounter, and solidarity in Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany. It provides information, news, events, and resources related to refugee aid and volunteer engagement.
Key services
Information dissemination, Volunteer coordination, Event organization, Newsletter distribution
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, PHP, CSS, Font Awesome
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of updated WordPress version (6.8.3)
  • Use of Contact Form 7 plugin with API caching

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based non-profit project site focused on refugee aid in Rheinland-Pfalz.
  2. Content is in German with some English language options.
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  4. No cookie consent banner detected despite GDPR relevance.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided including email and contact form.
  6. No explicit security policies or incident response information published.
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  8. Site uses HTTPS with valid SSL.
  9. No social media links found in the provided HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 with standard plugins such as Contact Form 7 and Ultimate Blocks. It uses jQuery and Font Awesome for UI elements. Hosting is provided by Manitu GmbH, indicated by the nameservers. The site loads CSS and JS assets from its own domain and trusted external sources like Google Fonts and WordPress.org. Performance is moderate with no major blocking scripts detected. The site is mobile responsive and uses semantic HTML5 elements. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA roles and better keyboard navigation support. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation menus. No advanced frameworks or headless CMS technologies are detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with civi-kune-rlp.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review civi-kune-rlp.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.