Skip to main content

Security report for cityinvestostrava.cz

CITY INVEST OSTRAVA, spol. s r.o. · Real Estate · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CITY INVEST OSTRAVA, spol. s r.o. is a small, well-established company specializing in construction investment consulting and technical supervision services primarily in the Moravian-Silesian region of the Czech Republic. With over 30 years of experience, the company offers a comprehensive range of services including project coordination, engineering, and investor advisory. The website reflects a professional business presence with detailed contact information and a clear service offering. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled, though security headers and privacy compliance measures are lacking. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification, but the website content and business details appear credible and trustworthy. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and serves its target audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cityinvestostrava.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong regional market position with a portfolio of over 120 projects and more than 55 satisfied clients, indicating steady business operations and client trust. Its business model focuses on providing specialized technical and consulting services to investors in the construction sector. The company emphasizes long-term client relationships and quality service delivery. The lack of social media presence and limited digital marketing tools suggest a traditional business approach. The detailed contact information with named executives supports transparency and accessibility. Growth opportunities may include enhancing digital presence and compliance documentation.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS ensuring encrypted communications, which is a fundamental security measure. However, it lacks advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate certain web-based attacks. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder timely security issue reporting. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, compliance policies, and incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and consider adding social media links to improve digital engagement.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
CITY INVEST OSTRAVA, spol. s r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CITY INVEST OSTRAVA, spol. s r.o.
Description
CITY INVEST OSTRAVA, spol. s r.o. operates in the construction sector for over 30 years, providing expert investor services in building construction, including technical supervision, project coordination, and consulting primarily in the Moravian-Silesian region of the Czech Republic.
Key services
Technical and construction supervision for investors, Investor and consulting services, Engineering activities including permitting and negotiations, Project coordination and cost estimation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.8.12, Slider Revolution 6.2.22, JetMenu, JetElements, JetBlocks, Google Maps iframe
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  3. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain legitimacy verification.
  4. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and good technical implementation.
  5. Contact information is detailed and includes multiple named executives with emails.
  6. No social media links detected on the homepage.
  7. No forms detected on the homepage; no data collection forms present.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No incident response or security policy information present.
  10. No certifications or compliance badges displayed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.8.12 with popular plugins such as Slider Revolution and JetMenu, indicating a modern CMS-based infrastructure. The site uses minified CSS and JS assets for performance optimization and includes Google Maps integration for location display. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO meta tags are properly configured. However, no advanced analytics or tracking scripts were detected, suggesting minimal user tracking. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through further optimization and caching strategies. The technical setup is stable and suitable for the business needs but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cityinvestostrava.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cityinvestostrava.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.