Skip to main content

Security report for cityfood.lv

CityFood · Retail · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CityFood.lv is a Latvian food delivery service specializing in a variety of cuisines including sushi, burgers, wok, salads, and desserts, targeting customers primarily in Riga. The website presents a professional and user-friendly interface with clear navigation and multiple food categories, supporting online ordering and home delivery. The business appears well-established with significant customer engagement indicated by social media followers and order volumes. Technically, the site employs modern tracking and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Yandex Metrika, indicating a mature digital marketing approach. However, explicit security headers are not detected, and WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, which slightly reduces transparency. Privacy compliance is addressed with a cookie consent mechanism and a privacy policy page in Latvian, suggesting GDPR awareness. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and credible, with room for improvement in security best practices and WHOIS transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cityfood.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CityFood.lv operates in the retail and hospitality sectors, focusing on food delivery within Riga. Its business model revolves around online ordering and home delivery, catering to a broad local audience. The company leverages social media and digital marketing to maintain a strong market presence. The absence of detailed WHOIS data limits insights into company registration and domain age, but the website's content and customer metrics suggest a medium-sized, established business. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the data. The company maintains a consistent brand image and offers a comprehensive menu, supporting customer retention and growth. The use of multiple analytics and advertising platforms indicates a strategic approach to customer acquisition and engagement.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, and implements a cookie consent banner aligned with GDPR requirements. However, no explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options are detected, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. The presence of multiple third-party tracking scripts introduces potential privacy and security risks if not regularly audited. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency in security management. The lack of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts assessment of domain legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is moderate, with foundational protections in place but opportunities for strengthening security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to improve site security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and privacy risks.
  4. Improve WHOIS transparency by ensuring domain registration details are accessible and up to date.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and mobile optimization to improve user experience across devices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CityFood
Description
Food delivery service in Riga offering sushi, burgers, wok, salads, snacks, soups, desserts, and drinks with free delivery starting from 20€.
Key services
Food delivery, Online ordering, Various food categories including sushi, burgers, wok, salads, snacks, soups, desserts, drinks
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika, jQuery, Mustache.js, WebFont Loader
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URLs)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  3. Clear business focus on food delivery in Riga with multiple food categories.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy present indicating GDPR awareness.
  5. No explicit security headers detected; HTTPS usage assumed but not confirmed by headers.
  6. Multiple tracking and analytics scripts used for marketing and user behavior analysis.
  7. Contact information includes phone number and an obfuscated email address in footer.
  8. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information available.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected; content safe for general audience.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Yandex Metrika for analytics and marketing. It loads fonts asynchronously and uses Mustache.js for templating. The site is responsive with good mobile optimization and clear navigation. Performance is moderate, with deferred styles and asynchronous script loading to improve load times. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. The site lacks advanced security headers and detailed metadata such as Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data. SEO is supported by meta description and keywords, though keywords are empty. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and structured data for better SEO and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cityfood.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cityfood.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.