Skip to main content

Security report for citadakuka.lv

SIA SUPERKASTE · Retail · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Citāda Kūka is a small Latvian bakery business specializing in vegan, gluten-free, and refined sugar-free cakes and desserts. The company operates an e-commerce platform offering local delivery and pickup services primarily in Jelgava, Latvia. Their product range includes various cake categories, desserts, and baking masterclasses, targeting health-conscious consumers seeking alternative bakery options. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and consistent branding, supporting their niche market position. Technically, the website uses a modern but simple tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience, although accessibility features are basic. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage but lacks visible security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. Privacy and terms policies are present as downloadable PDFs, indicating some compliance with GDPR requirements. Security-wise, no critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, but the absence of security headers and cookie consent reduces the overall security score. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. The business information on the site appears consistent and trustworthy, with clear contact details and company registration data. Overall, the website presents a credible, small-scale bakery business with a good digital presence but could improve security and privacy compliance aspects to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching citadakuka.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Citāda Kūka operates in the retail sector focusing on specialty bakery products with a health-conscious and vegan niche. Their competitive advantage lies in offering alternative flour, vegan, and sugar-free desserts, catering to a growing market segment in Latvia. The business model is direct-to-consumer e-commerce with local delivery and pickup, supported by recipe sharing and masterclasses to engage customers. Revenue streams likely include product sales and educational services. The company maintains active social media channels to build community and brand awareness. Growth potential exists in expanding delivery areas and enhancing online marketing. Partnerships or subsidiaries were not identified, indicating an independent small business structure.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options weakens defense against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is provided, indicating limited formal security governance. Privacy compliance is partial, with privacy and terms policies available but no cookie consent mechanism. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The use of Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking, which should be balanced with privacy controls. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but requires improvements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website to demonstrate security governance.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and meet legal requirements.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA SUPERKASTE
Registration number
40103974561
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA SUPERKASTE
Description
Online bakery specializing in alternative, vegan, and refined sugar-free cakes and desserts with delivery and pickup options in Jelgava, Latvia.
Key services
Cake sales, Dessert sales, Delivery services, Masterclasses, Recipe sharing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.0, Bootstrap CSS, Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage assumed (based on URL scheme)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Privacy policy and terms of service are provided as PDFs linked in the footer.
  4. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy detected.
  5. Contact information includes company email and physical address in Jelgava, Latvia.
  6. No phone numbers or contact forms explicitly found in the HTML content.
  7. Social media links to Instagram and Facebook are present.
  8. Website uses Google Analytics for tracking.
  9. No security headers detected in the provided data; SSL status unknown but HTTPS used.
  10. Content is focused on vegan, gluten-free, and alternative flour bakery products.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a straightforward technology stack with jQuery 3.6.0 and Bootstrap for responsive design. Google Analytics is integrated via gtag.js for visitor tracking. The HTML structure is valid and content-rich, supporting good SEO basics. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive images and layout. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected, suggesting a custom or simple hosting environment. Performance is moderate, with external dependencies on Google services. Accessibility is basic, lacking ARIA roles or advanced features. The site could benefit from modern frameworks or CMS for easier maintenance and scalability. Security technical debt includes missing security headers and lack of cookie consent mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with citadakuka.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review citadakuka.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.